From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tiwei Bie Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] net/virtio: improve offload check performance Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 19:20:29 +0800 Message-ID: <20180605112029.GA27423@debian> References: <20180601124758.22652-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> <20180601124758.22652-5-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> <20180604115507.GA21406@debian> <5b8d8122-5521-2f65-51e8-224f49f8fb57@redhat.com> <20180605031057.GA5404@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: zhihong.wang@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org To: Maxime Coquelin Return-path: Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849FB1B7E7 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 13:20:17 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:43:11AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > On 06/05/2018 05:10 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 04:29:56PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > > On 06/04/2018 01:55 PM, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:47:58PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > [...] > > > > > @@ -253,13 +246,15 @@ virtqueue_enqueue_xmit(struct virtnet_tx *txvq, struct rte_mbuf *cookie, > > > > > struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr; > > > > > int offload; > > > > > - offload = tx_offload_enabled(vq->hw); > > > > > head_idx = vq->vq_desc_head_idx; > > > > > idx = head_idx; > > > > > dxp = &vq->vq_descx[idx]; > > > > > dxp->cookie = (void *)cookie; > > > > > dxp->ndescs = needed; > > > > > + offload = vq->hw->has_tx_offload && > > > > > + (cookie->ol_flags & PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK); > > > > > > > > If features aren't negotiated, I think there is no need to > > > > check ol_flags and update the net header. > > > > > > Isn't what the code is doing? > > > has_tx_offload will be false if none of the Tx offload features have > > > been negotiated, so ol_flags won't be checked in that case. > > > > Hmm.. Somehow I treated 'and' as 'or'.. > > > > I have another question. When 'can_push' is false > > and 'vq->hw->has_tx_offload' is true, there will > > be a chance that virtio net hdr won't be zeroed > > when ol_flags doesn't specify any Tx offloads. > > Right, good catch. > It may be better to remove this small optimization. > Indeed, with the series, if the application does not enable offloads, > then the Virtio features are re-negotiated with the offload features. Yeah. It's a good idea to disable the features when the corresponding Tx offloads aren't requested by the applications! I like it! This issue happens for the mbufs whose ol_flags doesn't specify Tx offloads when applications enable Tx offloads and can_push is false. I think when applications enable Tx offloads, although most packets to be sent will have Tx offloads specified in their ol_flags, it's still possible that some packets don't have Tx offloads specified in their ol_flags. Best regards, Tiwei Bie > > Thanks, > Maxime > > > Best regards, > > Tiwei Bie > >