From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: DPDK checkpatch and SPDX tags? Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 10:15:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20180608101511.567e4716@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f48.google.com (mail-pg0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5125F5F2C for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 19:15:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 15-v6so6685798pge.2 for ; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 10:15:14 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" What ever happened to my patch to fix the DPDK checkpatch wrapper ignore fields? Is the build bot using current version? Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/40880 _coding style issues_ WARNING:SPDX_LICENSE_TAG: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 #158: FILE: drivers/bus/vmbus/linux/vmbus_bus.c:1: +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause WARNING:AVOID_EXTERNS: externs should be avoided in .c files #185: FILE: drivers/bus/vmbus/linux/vmbus_bus.c:28: +extern struct rte_vmbus_bus rte_vmbus_bus; WARNING:SPDX_LICENSE_TAG: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 #519: FILE: drivers/bus/vmbus/linux/vmbus_uio.c:1: +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause WARNING:SPDX_LICENSE_TAG: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 #1839: FILE: drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_bufring.c:1: +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause WARNING:SPDX_LICENSE_TAG: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 #2086: FILE: drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_channel.c:1: +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause