From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: netvsc PMD driver update plan Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:58:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20180622095840.6e6dc0a2@xeon-e3> References: <20180621163229.6ffc0438@xeon-e3> <1988649.YSVrmVpF1B@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com (mail-pf0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D611BB0C for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2018 05:58:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y8-v6so4056926pfm.10 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 20:58:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1988649.YSVrmVpF1B@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:17:37 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 22/06/2018 01:32, Stephen Hemminger: > > I have some updates to the netvsc driver that use external mbuf's and fix > > a couple of bugs. Would you rather: > > * new (V11) version consolidating those > > * sequence of patches against V10 > > * hold off until V10 is merged. > > A v11 is better. > > Ok, I am about to go on vacation, and rather than rushing out a new version. Will send an update when I get back in 2 weeks.