From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] netvsc: resize event buffer as needed Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 10:22:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20180813102227.09a26d5e@xeon-e3> References: <20180813155108.6460-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20180813155108.6460-3-stephen@networkplumber.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mail-pl0-f67.google.com (mail-pl0-f67.google.com [209.85.160.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70ADA37A2 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 19:22:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl0-f67.google.com with SMTP id s17-v6so7159336plp.7 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 10:22:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180813155108.6460-3-stephen@networkplumber.org> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 08:51:08 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The event buffer was changed to be a fixed size value, but it > is not large enough for a forwarding stress test. > > This version of event buffer code uses malloc/realloc to size > the event buffer as needed. Malloc is preferred over rte_malloc > because the event buffer does not need to be used for DMA > and huge page is a limited resource. > > Fixes: 530af95a7849 ("bus/vmbus: avoid signalling host on read") > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Self NAK. This won't work when secondary process needs the buffer.