From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] eventdev: add caps API and PMD callbacks for eth Tx adapter Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:41:41 +0530 Message-ID: <20180821091139.GA13834@jerin> References: <1534479652-80182-1-git-send-email-nikhil.rao@intel.com> <1534479652-80182-2-git-send-email-nikhil.rao@intel.com> <20180819104534.GB11085@jerin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org To: "Rao, Nikhil" Return-path: Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam02on0080.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.36.80]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAADCDED for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 11:13:20 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" -----Original Message----- > Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:22:15 +0530 > From: "Rao, Nikhil" > To: Jerin Jacob > CC: olivier.matz@6wind.com, dev@dpdk.org, nikhil.rao@intel.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] eventdev: add caps API and PMD callbacks for > eth Tx adapter > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 > Thunderbird/60.0 > > External Email > > On 8/19/2018 4:15 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:50:50 +0530 > > > From: Nikhil Rao > > > To: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com > > > CC: dev@dpdk.org, Nikhil Rao > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] eventdev: add caps API and PMD callbacks for eth Tx > > > adapter > > > X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 > > > > > > > > > The caps API allows the application to query if the transmit > > > stage is implemented in the eventdev PMD or uses the common > > > rte_service function. The PMD callbacks support the > > > eventdev PMD implementation of the adapter. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao > > > --- > > > + > > > static inline int > > > rte_event_dev_queue_config(struct rte_eventdev *dev, uint8_t nb_queues) > > > { > > > @@ -1275,6 +1300,15 @@ int rte_event_dev_selftest(uint8_t dev_id) > > > return RTE_EVENT_MAX_DEVS; > > > } > > > > > > @@ -1295,6 +1329,9 @@ struct rte_eventdev * > > > > > > eventdev = &rte_eventdevs[dev_id]; > > > > > > + if (eventdev->txa_enqueue == NULL) > > > > Is this check required, it will be always NULL. Right? if so, > > Can't we write eventdev->txa_enqueue directly? > > > > > + eventdev->txa_enqueue = rte_event_tx_adapter_enqueue; > > > + > > > > The thought was that if the PMD supports txa_enqueue then it wouldn't be > NULL. Yes that's true. But in rte_event_pmd_allocate(), eventdev->txa_enqueue it will be NULL. Right? Do we need to add the if (eventdev->txa_enqueue == NULL) check? > > Thanks for the review, > Nikhil >