From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] mem: support using memfd segments for
 in-memory mode
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:09:01 +0530
Message-ID: <20180824043900.GA9021@jerin>
References: <cover.1535041359.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
 <4e780007ecfc3c1c5e8a249f69236b407d2e98d0.1535041359.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, ray.kinsella@intel.com,
 zhihong.wang@intel.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com,
 kuralamudhan.ramakrishnan@intel.com
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-eopbgr700074.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.70.74])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5732C0C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 06:39:21 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4e780007ecfc3c1c5e8a249f69236b407d2e98d0.1535041359.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 17:59:55 +0100
> From: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> CC: tiwei.bie@intel.com, ray.kinsella@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
>  maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, kuralamudhan.ramakrishnan@intel.com
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/8] mem: support using memfd segments for
>  in-memory mode
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.7
> 
> 
> Enable using memfd-created segments if supported by the system.
> 
> This will allow having real fd's for pages but without hugetlbfs
> mounts, which will enable in-memory mode to be used with virtio.
> 
> The implementation is mostly piggy-backing on existing real-fd
> code, except that we no longer need to unlink any files or track
> per-page locks in single-file segments mode, because in-memory
> mode does not support secondary processes anyway.
> 
> We move some checks from EAL command-line parsing code to memalloc
> because it is now possible to use single-file segments mode with
> in-memory mode, but only if memfd is supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c |   6 +-
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memalloc.c | 265 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> +static inline uint32_t
> +bsf64(uint64_t v)
> +{
> +       return (uint32_t)__builtin_ctzll(v);
> +}
> +
> +static inline uint32_t
> +log2_u64(uint64_t v)
> +{
> +       if (v == 0)
> +               return 0;
> +       v = rte_align64pow2(v);
> +       return bsf64(v);
> +}
> +

Can we move this to lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h?
It has already rte_log2_u32()