From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] app/testpmd: add new command for show port info Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:37:03 -0700 Message-ID: <20180829083703.1f5d6c86@xeon-e3> References: <1535536120-6934-1-git-send-email-emma.finn@intel.com> <1535539649-7385-1-git-send-email-emma.finn@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, john.mcnamara@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, bernard.iremonger@intel.com To: Emma Finn Return-path: Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com (mail-pf1-f196.google.com [209.85.210.196]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440B3231E for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 17:37:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id k19-v6so2458509pfi.1 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:37:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1535539649-7385-1-git-send-email-emma.finn@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 11:47:29 +0100 Emma Finn wrote: > existing testpmd command "show port info" is too verbose. > Added a new summary command to print brief information on ports. > > console output: > testpmd> show port summary all > Number of available ports: 2 > Port MAC Address Name Driver Status Link > 0 11:22:33:44:55:66 0000:07:00.0, net_i40e, up, 40000 Mbps > 1 66:55:44:33:22:11 0000:07:00.1, net_i40e, up, 40000 Mbps > > Signed-off-by: Emma Finn > Looks good, thanks for doing this. Is there a good way to handle ports that are "owned" as in bonding/failsafe etc? Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger