From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] examples/vdpa: introduce a new sample
	for vDPA
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 23:17:33 +0800
Message-ID: <20180928151733.GA44818@intel.com>
References: <20180926090638.4705-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
 <20180928112344.42791-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
 <20180928112344.42791-3-xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
 <e1452c00-6fd8-89a1-0722-f77cf4893650@redhat.com>
 <20180928143353.GA44187@intel.com>
 <af8317de-e91f-3f27-2aa8-b69ed0311618@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
 Zhihong Wang <zhihong.wang@intel.com>, xiao.w.wang@intel.com,
 Rami Rosen <roszenrami@gmail.com>, Wang Haiyue <haiyue.wang@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B75F5F0F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 10:29:48 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <af8317de-e91f-3f27-2aa8-b69ed0311618@redhat.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 09/28, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>
>On 09/28/2018 04:33 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>> On 09/28, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> > > +	ret = rte_eal_init(argc, argv);
>> > > +	if (ret < 0)
>> > > +		rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "eal init failed\n");
>> > > +	argc -= ret;
>> > > +	argv += ret;
>> > > +
>> > > +	data_init();
>> > 
>> > You need to check return from data_init().
>> > If this is fine for you, I can change to below code when applying:
>> > 
>> > ret = data_init();
>> > if (ret < 0)
>> >     rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "data init failed\n");
>> > 
>> > 
>> 
>> I'm fine with this change.
>
>Or even better, get rid of data_init and
>call rte_vdpa_get_device_num(); in main directly.

Sounds better, as we've removed unnecessary static variable initialization in  
data_init, it does nothing but call rte_vdpa_get_device_num, we can remove this
wrap. Would you do this change when applying or you perfer I send a new 
revision?

Thanks,
Xiaolong


>
>> Thanks,
>> Xiaolong
>>