From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerin Jacob Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc/tm: update support for pf only Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 21:04:39 +0530 Message-ID: <20181015153438.GA9264@jerin> References: <20181015070451.35332-1-vipin.varghese@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, stephen1.byrne@intel.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, declan.doherty@intel.com To: Vipin Varghese Return-path: Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr690057.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.69.57]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7CF2BD3 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:34:59 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181015070451.35332-1-vipin.varghese@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" -----Original Message----- > Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:34:51 +0530 > From: Vipin Varghese > To: dev@dpdk.org, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com > CC: stephen1.byrne@intel.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, > declan.doherty@intel.com, Vipin Varghese > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc/tm: update support for pf only > X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 > > > Documentation is updated to highlight the support for DPDK ethernet > interface for Traffic Manager is currently limited to PF only. Why limit the specification to only PF devices? If a specific HW can support only PF devices, it can register tm ops only to PF devices. There are Hardwars which can support TM on VF as well, off course HW capabilities may be different, It can expressed with exiting TM capabilities structures.