From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Liang, Ma" Subject: Re: is per patch checkpatch reports working? Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:45:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20181019104532.GB1349@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> References: <41b40e2e-3b15-f7b3-78df-660610fe0486@intel.com> <1925609.vO2Ab2XL5m@xps> <20181019103829.GA1349@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> <2975014.4ik6Sx9Qhf@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Qian Xu , dpdk-dev , dpdk-test-report To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2975014.4ik6Sx9Qhf@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" I did send out a patch to the author for a while. but no response. FYI http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/46101/ Liang On 19 Oct 12:43, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > You should open a dedicated thread on the mailing with Cc the author of this script. > > 19/10/2018 12:38, Liang, Ma: > > Hi Thomas, > > I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh. > > that script still put '+' as the Section name. > > any suggestion ? > > I use fedora 24 and gawk > > Regards > > Liang > > > > On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit: > > > > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me. > > > > > > Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working. > > > > > > I have just restarted it. > > > > > > For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with > > > the new check in checkpatches.sh. > > > > > > > > > > > > >