From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/2] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 08:25:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20181223162556.GS4170@linux.ibm.com> References: <20181122033055.3431-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20181222021420.5114-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20181222021420.5114-3-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20181222233051.0a930102@xeon-e3> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli , dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, dharmik.thakkar@arm.com, nd@arm.com, Malvika Gupta To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872F21B54E for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 17:25:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wBNGPRmS011008 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 11:25:52 -0500 Received: from e12.ny.us.ibm.com (e12.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.202]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2pj3k1u5jn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 11:25:52 -0500 Received: from localhost by e12.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:25:52 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181222233051.0a930102@xeon-e3> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:30:51PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 20:14:20 -0600 > Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > > From: Dharmik Thakkar > > > > Add API positive/negative test cases and functional tests. > > > > Signed-off-by: Malvika Gupta > > Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar > > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > > Just a thought, could you build stress tests like the kernel RCU tests? > One worry is that RCU does not play well with blocking threads (and sometimes preemption). There are similar tests in the userspace RCU library, as well, which can be found at http://liburcu. Thanx, Paul