From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hyong Youb Kim <hyonkim@cisco.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] net/bonding: a couple minor fixes
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 02:22:33 -0800
Message-ID: <20190110102235.1238-1-hyonkim@cisco.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Hyong Youb Kim <hyonkim@cisco.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
 Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>, Chas Williams <chas3@att.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC711B5BC
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 11:23:17 +0100 (CET)
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

A couple patches for minor issues found during in-house testing. I do
not have a strong opinion on the first one, as it is just a warning
message not technically a bug. But, the second one addresses an
easy-to-reproduce crash. If someone has a better/cleaner fix, I am all
ears.

Hyong Youb Kim (2):
  net/bonding: do not set promisc on non-existent primary port
  net/bonding: avoid the next active slave going out of bound

 drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

-- 
2.16.2