From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] igb_uio: remove out-of-date comment
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:17:05 +0800
Message-ID: <20190116051704.GA39571@intel.com>
References: <20190115154626.34516-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
 <20190116003452.37403-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
 <20190115173822.25a4a979@shemminger-XPS-13-9360>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10441F11
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:17:06 +0100 (CET)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190115173822.25a4a979@shemminger-XPS-13-9360>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 01/15, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 08:34:52 +0800
>Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> The comment for igbuio_pci_irqhandler is out of date as the code evolves,
>> remove it to avoid misleading.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/linux/igb_uio/igb_uio.c | 4 ----
>>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/linux/igb_uio/igb_uio.c b/kernel/linux/igb_uio/igb_uio.c
>> index 3cf394bdf..d6ac51e79 100644
>> --- a/kernel/linux/igb_uio/igb_uio.c
>> +++ b/kernel/linux/igb_uio/igb_uio.c
>> @@ -185,10 +185,6 @@ igbuio_pci_irqcontrol(struct uio_info *info, s32 irq_state)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/**
>> - * This is interrupt handler which will check if the interrupt is for the right device.
>> - * If yes, disable it here and will be enable later.
>> - */
>>  static irqreturn_t
>>  igbuio_pci_irqhandler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>  {
>
>The comment is partially correct; if you look at the legacy case.
>
>Maybe better to move the comment to pci_check_and_mask_intx in compat.h?
>I see there is another incorrect comment there.
>

Hmm, you're right, this comment is correct for the legacy case, I'll move the
comment to pci_check_and_mask_intx as you suggested.

Thanks,
Xiaolong