From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] build: use dependency() instead of find_library() Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:31:54 +0000 Message-ID: <20190212113154.GA517812@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20190103175725.5836-1-bluca@debian.org> <20190206170848.19059-1-bluca@debian.org> <20190206170848.19059-2-bluca@debian.org> <3082304.pESdSe8qVs@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Luca Boccassi , dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9381B39C for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:31:58 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3082304.pESdSe8qVs@xps> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:15:43PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 06/02/2019 18:08, Luca Boccassi: > > Whenever possible (if the library ships a pkg-config file) use meson's > > dependency() function to look for it, as it will automatically add it > > to the Requires.private list if needed, to allow for static builds to > > succeed for reverse dependencies of DPDK. Otherwise the recursive > > dependencies are not parsed, and users doing static builds have to > > resolve them manually by themselves. > > When using this API avoid additional checks that are superfluous and > > take extra time, and avoid adding the linker flag manually which causes > > it to be duplicated. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson > > This patch breaks compilation on my machine with a lot of strange errors: > > from drivers/net/pcap/rte_eth_pcap.c > > /usr/include/stdint.h:109: error: "__INT64_C" redefined > /usr/include/bits/stdlib-bsearch.h:32:13: error: cast discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type > /usr/include/pthread.h:682:6: error: 'regparm' attribute directive ignored > etc > Is this on Arch linux again? I just reverified these first two patches and they work fine for me on Fedora (I assume Luca probably tested them already on Debian) Anything unusual about your setup? /Bruce