From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ye Xiaolong Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] net/af_xdp: introduce AF_XDP PMD driver Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 11:34:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20190317033425.GA103486@intel.com> References: <20190301080947.91086-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <20190301080947.91086-2-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <20190302081407.GD100586@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Qi Zhang To: Luca Boccassi Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BA8152A for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 04:38:12 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190302081407.GD100586@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 03/02, Ye Xiaolong wrote: >>> _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_AF_PACKET) += -lrte_pmd_af_packet >>> +_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_AF_XDP) += -lrte_pmd_af_xdp >>> -lelf -lbpf >> >>Are symbols from libelf being used by the PMD? > >Hmm, it is a leftover of RFC, libelf is no longer needed in this version, will >remove it in next version. > Correction, libelf is needed for libbpf, so we still need to keep it. Thanks, Xiaolong >Thanks, >Xiaolong >> >>> _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ARK_PMD) += -lrte_pmd_ark >>> _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ATLANTIC_PMD) += -lrte_pmd_atlantic >>> _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_AVF_PMD) += -lrte_pmd_avf >> >>-- >>Kind regards, >>Luca Boccassi