From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF69C10F14 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0158C206B6 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:24:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0158C206B6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3735C1C1C2; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:24:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810541C19B; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:24:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3E7451EF1; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amorenoz.users.ipa.redhat.com (ovpn-117-37.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.37]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E615B60BE0; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 08:24:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Adrian Moreno To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: tiwei.bie@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, Adrian Moreno , stable@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:23:34 +0200 Message-Id: <20191008082334.21244-4-amorenoz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20191008082334.21244-1-amorenoz@redhat.com> References: <20191008082334.21244-1-amorenoz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 08:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost: prevent zero copy mode if iommu is on X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" The simltaneous use of dequeue_zero_copy and IOMMU is problematic. Not only because IOVA_VA mode is not supported but also because the potential invalidation of guest pages while the buffers are in use, is not handled. Prevent these two features to be enabled simultaneosly. Fixes: 69c90e98f483 ("vhost: enable IOMMU support") Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno Reviewed-by: Tiwei Bie --- lib/librte_vhost/socket.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c b/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c index 274988c4d..810049c15 100644 --- a/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/socket.c @@ -871,6 +871,14 @@ rte_vhost_driver_register(const char *path, uint64_t flags) } vsocket->dequeue_zero_copy = flags & RTE_VHOST_USER_DEQUEUE_ZERO_COPY; + if (vsocket->dequeue_zero_copy && + (flags & RTE_VHOST_USER_IOMMU_SUPPORT)) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG, + "error: enabling dequeue zero copy and IOMMU features " + "simultaneously is not supported\n"); + goto out_mutex; + } + /* * Set the supported features correctly for the builtin vhost-user * net driver. -- 2.21.0