From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F629C433DB for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 03:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FDF64EA1 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 03:18:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D5FDF64EA1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E131240249; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 04:18:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C20240247 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 04:18:54 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: SDADVp4HVRQUpsLuargePvjXaiitGsTOCbHwxW1swk7zCb7c2fB3sAZTgQna1S0ZWxs81lq/Re 8eojk0H1kpOg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9882"; a="177281476" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,393,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="177281476" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2021 19:18:53 -0800 IronPort-SDR: e1C5vgs5HrmCNjZ6AbLrASdTilVpzSt8JxRONMrksqP6cirfhZNvm0kK+qsyIGV2BQslpQu1hC iAy9uhZAUooA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,393,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="391259959" Received: from dpdk-liulingy-1.sh.intel.com ([10.67.118.243]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2021 19:18:52 -0800 From: Liulingyu To: dev@dpdk.org, beilei.xing@intel.com Cc: Liulingyu Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:56:22 +0000 Message-Id: <20210202095622.28228-1-lingyu.liu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210201095828.8178-1-lingyu.liu@intel.com> References: <20210201095828.8178-1-lingyu.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: add mirror rule limitation of X722 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Currently, X722 firmware doesn't support to add more than one mirror rule in one VSI. Signed-off-by: Liulingyu --- V2 change: - refine commit log doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst b/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst index 20c998398c..c9de2e19aa 100644 --- a/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst +++ b/doc/guides/nics/i40e.rst @@ -723,6 +723,11 @@ When programming cloud filters for IPv4/6_UDP/TCP/SCTP with SRC port only or DST it will make any cloud filter using inner_vlan or tunnel key invalid. Default configuration will be recovered only by NIC core reset. +Mirror rule limitation for X722 +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Due to firmware restriction of X722, the same VSI cannot have more than one mirror rule. + High Performance of Small Packets on 40GbE NIC ---------------------------------------------- -- 2.25.1