From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Martin Spinler <spinler@cesnet.cz>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] net/nfb: code cleanup
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 09:39:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260116093925.6e397c33@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03920b87aa9203f2e9eae239e2fd1a9811f6bfdd.camel@cesnet.cz>
On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 10:42:20 +0100
Martin Spinler <spinler@cesnet.cz> wrote:
> Hi Stephen!
>
> Thanks for quick review, my reaction to issues:
>
> 1/6: The log message at line 543: fixed
> 2/6: Still missing NULL pointer checks: misleading,
> dev->data->nb_rx_queues ensures the queue[i] was inited
> 4/6: uint16_t: applied, Doxygen comment: fixed
> 5/6: extra blank line: fixed
> Those fixes will be in v3.
>
> 3,4,5,6/6: I think don't want to add Cc to stable, if you agree?
>
>
> Besides that series and 'net-nfb/rework to real multiport', I have
> another 3 series of a similar size that depends on those series: Native
> Queues, Metadata+Offloads, and Ethernet. To make the work easier, would
> you prefer to have it in one 19-commit series or should I to continue
> in 3 small series?
>
> Thanks! Martin
Only cc stable if the driver was released in a stable version and
it is something that could be triggerable by bad input
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-16 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-15 14:01 [PATCH 0/6] spinler
2026-01-15 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] net/nfb: use constant values for max Rx/Tx queues count spinler
2026-01-15 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] net/nfb: fix bad pointer access in queue stats spinler
2026-01-15 14:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] net/nfb: update timestamp calculation to meaningful value spinler
2026-01-15 14:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] net/nfb: use process private variable for internal data spinler
2026-01-15 14:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] net/nfb: release allocated resources correctly spinler
2026-01-15 14:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] net/nfb: stop only started queues in fail path spinler
2026-01-15 14:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] net/nfb: code cleanup spinler
2026-01-15 14:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] net/nfb: use constant values for max Rx/Tx queues count spinler
2026-01-15 14:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] net/nfb: fix bad pointer access in queue stats spinler
2026-01-15 14:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] net/nfb: update timestamp calculation to meaningful value spinler
2026-01-15 14:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] net/nfb: use process private variable for internal data spinler
2026-01-15 14:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] net/nfb: release allocated resources correctly spinler
2026-01-15 14:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] net/nfb: stop only started queues in fail path spinler
2026-01-16 5:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] net/nfb: code cleanup Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-16 9:42 ` Martin Spinler
2026-01-16 17:39 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-01-16 15:20 ` spinler
2026-01-16 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] net/nfb: use constant values for max Rx/Tx queues count spinler
2026-02-02 17:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-02 18:58 ` Martin Špinler
2026-01-16 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] net/nfb: fix bad pointer access in queue stats spinler
2026-01-16 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] net/nfb: update timestamp calculation to meaningful value spinler
2026-01-16 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] net/nfb: use process private variable for internal data spinler
2026-01-20 0:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-20 14:13 ` Martin Spinler
2026-01-20 16:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-16 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] net/nfb: release allocated resources correctly spinler
2026-01-20 0:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-20 14:14 ` Martin Spinler
2026-01-16 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] net/nfb: stop only started queues in fail path spinler
2026-01-20 0:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-20 14:14 ` Martin Spinler
2026-01-16 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] net/nfb: code cleanup spinler
2026-01-21 4:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-21 17:01 ` [PATCH v4 " spinler
2026-01-21 17:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] net/nfb: use constant values for max Rx/Tx queues count spinler
2026-01-21 17:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] net/nfb: fix bad pointer access in queue stats spinler
2026-01-21 17:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] net/nfb: update timestamp calculation to meaningful value spinler
2026-01-21 17:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-27 8:12 ` Martin Spinler
2026-01-27 0:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-27 8:16 ` Martin Spinler
2026-01-21 17:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] net/nfb: use process private variable for internal data spinler
2026-01-21 17:01 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] net/nfb: release allocated resources correctly spinler
2026-01-21 17:01 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] net/nfb: stop only started queues in fail path spinler
2026-01-21 17:35 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] net/nfb: code cleanup Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-02 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 " spinler
2026-02-02 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] net/nfb: use constant values for max Rx/Tx queues count spinler
2026-02-02 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] net/nfb: fix bad pointer access in queue stats spinler
2026-02-10 0:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-02 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] net/nfb: update timestamp calculation to meaningful value spinler
2026-02-02 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] net/nfb: use process private variable for internal data spinler
2026-02-02 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] net/nfb: release allocated resources correctly spinler
2026-02-10 0:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-02 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] net/nfb: stop only started queues in fail path spinler
2026-02-03 1:50 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] net/nfb: code cleanup Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-03 6:36 ` Martin Spinler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260116093925.6e397c33@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=spinler@cesnet.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox