[PATCH v2 07/12] doc: improve new library guide style

[Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>]

Improve the new library contribution guide
- Converting passive voice to active voice
- Simplifying sentence structure
- Using more direct language

No technical content changes.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 doc/guides/contributing/new_library.rst | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/new_library.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/new_library.rst
index 99890beb29..25237b349f 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/new_library.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/new_library.rst
@@ -10,15 +10,15 @@ Process for approval in principle
 Rationale
 ~~~~~~~~~
 
-Adding a new library to DPDK with proper RFC and then full patch-sets is a significant work.
-In order to save effort, developers should get an early approval in principle,
-or an early feedback in case the library is not suitable for various reasons.
+Adding a new library to DPDK with proper RFC and then full patch-sets requires significant effort.
+To save effort, developers should seek early approval in principle,
+or early feedback if the library is unsuitable for various reasons.
 
 Process
 ~~~~~~~
 
-#. When a contributor would like to add a new library to DPDK code base,
-   the contributor must send the following items to DPDK mailing list
+#. When a contributor would like to add a new library to the DPDK code base,
+   the contributor must send the following items to the DPDK mailing list
    for Technical Board approval-in-principle.
 
    * Purpose of the library.
@@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ Process
 
    * Any new library dependencies to DPDK.
 
-#. Technical Board to schedule discussion on this in upcoming Technical Board meeting
-   along with author.
+#. Technical Board schedules discussion on this in an upcoming Technical Board meeting
+   along with the author.
    Based on the Technical Board schedule and/or author availability,
    Technical Board may need a maximum of **five** Technical Board meeting slots.
 
 #. Based on mailing list and Technical Board meeting discussions,
-   Technical Board to vote and share the decision in the mailing list.
+   Technical Board votes and shares the decision on the mailing list.
    The decision outcome can be any of the following:
 
    * Approved in principle
@@ -53,5 +53,5 @@ Process
 
 #. Once the Technical Board approves the library in principle,
    it is safe to start working on the implementation.
-   However, the patches will need to meet the usual quality criteria
-   in order to be effectively accepted.
+   However, the patches must meet the usual quality criteria
+   to be effectively accepted.
-- 
2.51.0