From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] af_packet correctness, performance, cksum
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 10:53:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260202105311.55e86cc8@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202081456.4322-1-scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 00:14:52 -0800
scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Scott <scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com>
>
> This series fixes critical thread safety bugs in the af_packet PMD
> and adds performance optimizations.
>
> Patch 1 fixes two major correctness issues:
> - Thread safety: tp_status was accessed without memory barriers,
> violating the kernel's PACKET_MMAP protocol. On aarch64 and other
> weakly-ordered architectures, this causes packet corruption due to
> missing memory ordering. The fix matches the kernel's memory model:
> volatile unaligned reads/writes with explicit rte_smp_rmb/wmb
> barriers and __may_alias__ protection.
>
> - Frame calculations: Fixed incorrect frame overhead and address
> calculations that caused memory corruption when frames don't evenly
> divide blocks.
Fix patch 4 and resubmit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 18:13 [PATCH v1 0/3] net/af_packet: correctness fixes and improvements scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-27 18:13 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] net/af_packet: fix thread safety and frame calculations scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-27 18:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-28 1:35 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-01-27 18:13 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] net/af_packet: RX/TX rte_memcpy, bulk free, prefetch scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-27 18:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-28 1:23 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-01-28 9:49 ` Morten Brørup
2026-01-28 15:37 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-01-28 16:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-27 18:13 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] net/af_packet: software checksum and tx poll control scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-27 18:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-28 7:05 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-01-28 17:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-28 18:59 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-01-27 20:45 ` [REVIEW] " Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-28 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] af_packet correctness, performance, cksum scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-28 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] net/af_packet: fix thread safety and frame calculations scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-28 16:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-28 18:00 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-01-28 18:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-28 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] net/af_packet: RX/TX unlikely, bulk free, prefetch scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-28 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] net/af_packet: tx poll control scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-28 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] net/af_packet: software checksum scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-28 18:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-01-28 19:08 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-01-28 19:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] af_packet correctness, performance, cksum scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-28 19:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] net/af_packet: fix thread safety and frame calculations scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-28 19:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] net/af_packet: RX/TX unlikely, bulk free, prefetch scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-29 1:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-02 5:29 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-01-28 19:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] net/af_packet: tx poll control scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-28 19:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] net/af_packet: software checksum scott.k.mitch1
2026-01-28 21:57 ` [REVIEW] " Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-02 7:55 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-02-02 16:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-02 8:14 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] af_packet correctness, performance, cksum scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-02 8:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] net/af_packet: fix thread safety and frame calculations scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-02 8:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] net/af_packet: RX/TX bulk free, unlikely hint scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-02 8:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] net/af_packet: tx poll control scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-02 8:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] net/af_packet: add software checksum offload support scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-02 17:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-02 18:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-03 6:41 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-02-02 18:53 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-02-03 7:07 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] af_packet correctness, performance, cksum scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-03 7:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] net/af_packet: fix thread safety and frame calculations scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-03 7:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] net/af_packet: RX/TX bulk free, unlikely hint scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-03 7:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] net/af_packet: tx poll control scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-03 7:07 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] net/af_packet: add software checksum offload support scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-03 8:20 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-02-03 14:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-04 2:59 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-02-03 14:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-04 1:39 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-02-05 21:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-06 1:11 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] af_packet correctness, performance, cksum scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-06 1:11 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] net/af_packet: fix thread safety and frame calculations scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-06 1:11 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] net/af_packet: RX/TX bulk free, unlikely hint scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-06 1:11 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] net/af_packet: tx poll control scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-06 1:11 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] net/af_packet: add software checksum offload support scott.k.mitch1
2026-02-06 1:49 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] af_packet correctness, performance, cksum Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-06 4:45 ` Scott Mitchell
2026-02-06 14:36 ` Morten Brørup
2026-02-06 16:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260202105311.55e86cc8@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=scott.k.mitch1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox