From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B79ECD983 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 16:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDE24275A; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 17:48:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886CC402E6 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 17:48:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43626796202so572820f8f.3 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2026 08:48:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1770310081; x=1770914881; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+0nHc6lbcpzXnCNmV6q6C4I1NIOaMvA5rEx9n26gCB0=; b=tapmOBpKxVZ/fYLI/+gqZ5YRi+SiIg6Wex5XwawdonjUZz1uN/LxpHzudbwoRA5gI3 uWPdVn10Jyx/WnyK0tQI6dhQsD5Rnz9fEuy+hr2eV9oEyEc8IAi8QCFmpNW9brWoi3r1 ++vPzXL6f4lz82vc6rmGeWXpz3O+wrtZucIdXSc7Hh3GoVbCUBNE00MEyqqvufMB8vx4 +U/GlZPSbTgWRmceLtSgxur7FE+pFguV+Gmkr79E3QDbJ2CfzErOmCIxdkHQlfETGTSh WFrhzv2MMp47QP0cUaa1CzsCEo6zZ5q2pfe2l3d4BtUwkJPlcx1KrZC33KZPAf1VaG9G +OyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1770310081; x=1770914881; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+0nHc6lbcpzXnCNmV6q6C4I1NIOaMvA5rEx9n26gCB0=; b=cTVmGbnEUsb6sfXLWGYWsPDE45424ZsWqtqdHph0HM++y8o1p6SP3LRi612DidgAIQ LNayyKYbSlukPFXFBrmobwEDm8vijTAshB+VxoczV0aFyVkDT8/7doAv7m3MHjgfsL6Q Sn9txP5g5h0G1lZsHrKiN5Xwe3VBLCxKfsWYMDgbTBx33DpX7m7mJfctPOr4uWYcvcRS S2WmAz4qSAAxstwJu3pJqIJqf2LVeZN/gfENY8BLZ0LJQzegeDq7KnLWCyk+1tiZityB xqdASAKryka+W1/fEdelecbpLJd4N8GUjB6dKaJQfaRN2P1bONdfObd0wZ1OEceK0i9M rj4A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVygqiIhn0iqqzZPWhJydRjcmHZp9UUWIzvDyfwq5aPKvnaIAdwAdlP34edWifL6rYGQ4U=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxeHkFu1mgnpWx9ThVHaJMjurwJvfF3g0vSH2Q+1T05k6kEXV0s rb+pyflIdrkJlLEehDB9hPUT1LDNcCsv8UoNrQHIyM/VbW8t7rHttOEWEJFxuHGwxrc= X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aK5f/y6UO9lmbhNZ1SBR0BKUhCaFgMQelGzECjC6OImxvRpu+1qr79xtt4zv8p pq9y1lMzd75qCIMJE6XpU6M2IcfxdYsXPECASo+HUJPr1BL+WsA2nZb2y4HfF+/YcoUZEhnauec 4Pfz//QyIHpijX5jPFXdstU9k4Aq+oAUejKt7yvJC+4XprQpRtQ+WjP3XtUZ7NXMXjhTqyvaMbq lQ2ZIValfPlFUeduO65DJVjSV9Z7u5zDeeMYg3n1lKoAFlP1CMFc1y4uf1W1t3WYniEXTtlI4tZ mfQHJIpQ22jq+qlee6xRIVuTxvk20OaCaR0tvtC7jjMfPXs6PhjCcizDMGo/vT7C8x9FpGR23DF pESwQe+xrLzzqfX9Lz0yfyF1Lj33W568wbW5RSKOLAkYp+6FykAD6ZQMN9BJRfNMDxUYNybdb+5 sfdVqWVCt+I25D3nLAqjskgY8wrqpOmeLm5YBmmuMp2JvB1dHJvTv7 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:400e:b0:435:e451:39d4 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4361805bb39mr10502274f8f.44.1770310081093; Thu, 05 Feb 2026 08:48:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoenix.local (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-43617e3a486sm15354674f8f.16.2026.02.05.08.47.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Feb 2026 08:48:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 08:47:49 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: NAGENDRA BALAGANI Cc: "users@dpdk.org" , "dev@dpdk.org" , Kapil Kumar Jain Subject: Re: Clarification on Possible Buffer Overflow Issues Reported by Fortify Tool Message-ID: <20260205084749.7ccb9e0f@phoenix.local> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, 5 Feb 2026 06:58:29 +0000 NAGENDRA BALAGANI wrote: > Hi Team, > This is a gentle follow-up on my earlier mail regarding the Fortify static analysis findings in DPDK, for which I had also raised Bug 1748. > > Could you please let us know if there is any update or guidance from the community/maintainers on whether these are known false positives or if they need further investigation. > > Thank you for your time and support. Did you file bugzilla entries and/or submit patches?