public inbox for dev@dpdk.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <stable@dpdk.org>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] test/eal_flags: suppress vdev_netvsc auto-probe
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 09:10:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260223091005.6733c193@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZyHm4EmcMGe4ylr@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 17:00:11 +0000
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 22, 2026 at 06:49:44PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Feb 2026 14:15:42 -0800
> > Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Hyper-V systems (including Azure-hosted CI), the vdev_netvsc
> > > driver auto-injects itself during vdev bus scan. This interferes
> > > with the vdev flag test causing the nodeaction subprocess to fail.
> > > 
> > > Suppress by passing net_vdev_netvsc,ignore=1 in the valid vdev
> > > test cases. The scan callback sees it already in devargs and
> > > skips injection; the probe honours ignore and does nothing.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 0d684a783088 ("app/test: fix and separate --vdev unit test")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>  
> > 
> > Self NAK
> > 
> > This is not the underlying cause of the test failures.
> > The issue is likely parallel test invocation overlapping on the file prefix
> > which is already addressed by another pending patch series.
> > 
> > That said, something should be done about vdev_netvsc driver and github
> > interactions.  
> 
> I don't think it's parallel invocations - we don't run our unit tests in
> parallel in github actions. I'd also note that the current issues started
> appearing when we patched in support to pass through the drivers path to
> the secondary process calls so that they could match the primary instance.
> Therefore, I still suspect something in the pci or other bus scanning to be
> a problem. Do we need to disable the netvsc as in your patch and also pass
> in --no-pci to the test cases?
> 
> /Bruce

I am thinking that vdev_netvsc driver hack needs to have a way
of detecting whether it is being run in a test. Maybe getenv("DPDK_TEST")
or some other github detection.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-02-23 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-22 22:15 [RFC] test/eal_flags: suppress vdev_netvsc auto-probe Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-23  2:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-02-23 17:00   ` Bruce Richardson
2026-02-23 17:10     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260223091005.6733c193@phoenix.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox