From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5B0FC5901 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 06:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F0F4064F; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:56:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D09402E4 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:56:02 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1772088963; x=1803624963; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nFyefTlaRAU1GnBcAOo+tvD1ERX45eVKLfU+oH4YVhU=; b=hE5laRNfq3RnDnv0gnd2AmhSK06kdxeZf9aR+9+GRZ52MADRE+VHBycS PVySj+kj4YYIbwV9lg/q/bYsmrI0Lx0qAtJb2BCqbQXsj3LMYrlbP4Fa8 NUbxQD2XFyhPMuJ6KtsyrrUyDGLCKoiuNSZ/2vOyVcng817jMM/8UDiJL EoPg03PWBjVt9O7+AY1n5vi4agihU4i79RnaWCAiVIQyvEg0mGhBk//5G YZkXj2WtuRZKC4FgKwf/k0pSgHBUKir5Mid8FpEwJFKW0GTQPve3Udu4i YX6FT3LQijN9Lnx9KwvpdKewHGywd28Ca4Bu1bAqXhWUdLf0l8o3sy+dZ g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VoNpgS+HQ0qp7KNX+/GUaQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: WBA5VtfSTeqxPisS2N8x4Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11712"; a="73322800" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,311,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="73322800" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Feb 2026 22:56:02 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: tQ7LtghORn2QDIspTOCkmg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UV02mMKISiOE9T5lwWIJeQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,311,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="214723487" Received: from unknown (HELO sprmax15..) ([10.138.182.128]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2026 22:56:01 -0800 From: Shaiq Wani To: dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, aman.deep.singh@intel.com Subject: [PATCH v13 3/3] doc: add note on unsupported completion queue sharing Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:22:33 +0530 Message-Id: <20260226065233.917107-4-shaiq.wani@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20260226065233.917107-1-shaiq.wani@intel.com> References: <20250917052658.582872-1-shaiq.wani@intel.com> <20260226065233.917107-1-shaiq.wani@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Added a note in the IDPF Poll Mode Driver documentation to clarify that sharing a completion queue among multiple TX queues serviced by different CPU cores is not supported in split queue mode. Signed-off-by: Shaiq Wani --- doc/guides/nics/idpf.rst | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/idpf.rst b/doc/guides/nics/idpf.rst index b99cc18188..47e38fcb13 100644 --- a/doc/guides/nics/idpf.rst +++ b/doc/guides/nics/idpf.rst @@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ Runtime Configuration Then the PMD will configure Tx queue with single queue mode. Otherwise, split queue mode is chosen by default. +.. note:: + + In split queue mode, sharing a completion queue among multiple TX queues that are + serviced by different CPU cores is not supported. + Driver compilation and testing ------------------------------ -- 2.34.1