From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/tap: fix close for partially configured port
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:31:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326113153.2bb2ef02@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326124612.2580985-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
On Thu, 26 Mar 2026 13:46:11 +0100
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> In case no rxq has been set up (like when starting testpmd with no mempool
> drivers), a crash happens in tap_dev_close:
>
> Thread 1 "dpdk-testpmd" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x00007ffff7fad68b in tap_dev_close (dev=dev@entry=0x4c4a80
> <rte_eth_devices@INTERNAL>) at ../drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c:1111
> 1111 struct rx_queue *rxq = dev->data->rx_queues[i];
>
> (gdb) p dev->data->rx_queues
> $4 = (void **) 0x0
>
> Fixes: 23e2387b49a1 ("net/tap: allocate queue structures dynamically")
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> ---
It looked ok, but then the AI review spotted some stuff...
Two issues:
The txq variable is declared as struct rx_queue * but should be
struct tx_queue *. Works by accident since it comes from a void *
array and is only NULL-tested and passed to rte_free(), but the
type is wrong.
Pre-existing: the loop runs to RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES but the
rx_queues/tx_queues arrays are allocated with nb_rx_queues /
nb_tx_queues entries by ethdev. If dev_configure() was called
with fewer queues, the arrays are non-NULL but the access is
out-of-bounds. Since these lines are being reworked anyway, worth
adding a bounds check against nb_rx_queues/nb_tx_queues. The
tap_queue_close() call is fine -- process_private fds are sized
to RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES.
Also missing Cc: stable@dpdk.org for a crash fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 12:46 [PATCH] net/tap: fix close for partially configured port David Marchand
2026-03-26 13:40 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-03-26 18:31 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-03-27 8:29 ` David Marchand
2026-03-27 8:39 ` [PATCH v2] " David Marchand
2026-03-27 15:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-03-27 16:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260326113153.2bb2ef02@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox