From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Jasper Tran O'Leary" <jtranoleary@google.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/gve: add passive device-requested reset
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2026 16:03:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260405160318.6d23ddd9@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260327002038.3386577-1-jtranoleary@google.com>
On Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:20:38 +0000
"Jasper Tran O'Leary" <jtranoleary@google.com> wrote:
> In addition to application-initiated resets, during normal operation,
> the device can indicate the need to reset by writing a value to a device
> status register. This patch introduces an alarm that polls the
> status of that register and informs the application of the need to
> reset. The application is responsible for registering a callback that
> will execute in the event that the alarm discovers that the device
> requests a reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jasper Tran O'Leary <jtranoleary@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com>
Makes sense, AI analysis had one item worth noting.
Not sure where documentation related (if any) should go.
The alarm callback calls rte_eth_dev_callback_process() synchronously,
which means the application's reset handler runs in the alarm thread
context. The documentation example shows calling rte_eth_dev_reset()
directly in the callback — this works (rte_eal_alarm_cancel from within
a callback is allowed), but a production application would likely want
to set a flag and handle the reset from the main thread. Worth a note
in the doc example.
The polling interval is 1 second vs 20 seconds in the kernel gve driver.
Not wrong, but more aggressive — is there a reason for the shorter interval?
Otherwise looks good.
Applied to next-net
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-05 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-27 0:20 [PATCH] net/gve: add passive device-requested reset Jasper Tran O'Leary
2026-03-27 16:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-05 23:03 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260405160318.6d23ddd9@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=joshwash@google.com \
--cc=jtranoleary@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox