From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/21] Building a better rte_flow parser
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 09:42:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260412094221.4defa766@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1773681363.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 17:27:28 +0000
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:
> Most rte_flow parsers in DPDK suffer from huge implementation complexity because
> even though 99% of what people use rte_flow parsers for is parsing protocol
> graphs, no parser is written explicitly as a graph. This patchset attempts to
> suggest a viable model to build rte_flow parsers as graphs, by offering a
> lightweight header only library to build rte_flow parsering graphs without too
> much boilerplate and complexity.
>
> Most of the patchset is about Intel drivers, but they are meant as
> reimplementations as well as examples for the rest of the community to assess
> how to build parsers using this new infrastructure. I expect the first two
> patches will be of most interest to non-Intel reviewers, as they deal with
> building two reusable parser architecture pieces.
>
> The first piece is a new flow graph helper in ethdev. Its purpose is
> deliberately narrow: it targets the protocol-graph part of rte_flow pattern
> parsing, where drivers walk packet headers and validate legal item sequences and
> parameters. That does not cover all possible rte_flow features, especially more
> exotic flow items, but it does cover a large and widely shared part of what
> existing drivers need to do. Or, to put it in other words, the only flow items
> this infrastructure *doesn't* cover is things that do not lend themselves well
> to be parsed as a graph of protocol headers (e.g. conntrack items). Everything
> else should be covered or cover-able.
>
> The second piece is a reusable flow engine framework for Intel Ethernet drivers.
> This is kept Intel-local for now because I do not feel it is generic enough to
> be presented as an ethdev-wide engine model. Even so, the intent is to establish
> a cleaner parser architecture with a defined interaction model, explicit memory
> ownership rules, and engine definitions that do not block secondary-process-safe
> usage. It is my hope that we could also promote something like this into ethdev
> proper and remove the necessity for drivers to build so much boilerplate around
> rte_flow parsing (and more often than not doing it in a way that is more complex
> than it needs to be).
>
> Most of the rest of the series is parser reimplementation, but that is mainly
> the vehicle for demonstrating and validating those two pieces. ixgbe and i40e
> are wired into the new common parsing path, and their existing parsers are
> migrated incrementally to the graph-based model. Besides reducing ad hoc parser
> code, this also makes validation more explicit and more consistent with the
> actual install path. In a few places that means invalid inputs that were
> previously ignored, deferred, or interpreted loosely are now rejected earlier
> and more strictly, without any increase in code complexity (in fact, with marked
> *decrease* of it!).
>
> Series depends on previously submitted patchsets:
>
> - IAVF global buffer fix [1]
> - Common attr parsing stuff [2]
>
> [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=37585&state=*
> [2] https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=37663&state=*
>
> Anatoly Burakov (21):
> ethdev: add flow graph API
> net/intel/common: add flow engines infrastructure
> net/intel/common: add utility functions
> net/ixgbe: add support for common flow parsing
> net/ixgbe: reimplement ethertype parser
> net/ixgbe: reimplement syn parser
> net/ixgbe: reimplement L2 tunnel parser
> net/ixgbe: reimplement ntuple parser
> net/ixgbe: reimplement security parser
> net/ixgbe: reimplement FDIR parser
> net/ixgbe: reimplement hash parser
> net/i40e: add support for common flow parsing
> net/i40e: reimplement ethertype parser
> net/i40e: reimplement FDIR parser
> net/i40e: reimplement tunnel QinQ parser
> net/i40e: reimplement VXLAN parser
> net/i40e: reimplement NVGRE parser
> net/i40e: reimplement MPLS parser
> net/i40e: reimplement gtp parser
> net/i40e: reimplement L4 cloud parser
> net/i40e: reimplement hash parser
>
> drivers/net/intel/common/flow_engine.h | 1003 ++++
> drivers/net/intel/common/flow_util.h | 165 +
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 56 +-
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 49 +-
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_fdir.c | 47 -
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow.c | 4092 +----------------
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow.h | 44 +
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow_ethertype.c | 258 ++
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow_fdir.c | 1806 ++++++++
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow_hash.c | 1289 ++++++
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow_tunnel.c | 1510 ++++++
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_hash.c | 980 +---
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_hash.h | 8 +-
> drivers/net/intel/i40e/meson.build | 4 +
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 40 +-
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 13 +-
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c | 13 +-
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 3130 +------------
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.h | 38 +
> .../net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_ethertype.c | 240 +
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_fdir.c | 1510 ++++++
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_hash.c | 182 +
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_l2tun.c | 228 +
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_ntuple.c | 483 ++
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_security.c | 297 ++
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_syn.c | 280 ++
> drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/meson.build | 7 +
> lib/ethdev/meson.build | 1 +
> lib/ethdev/rte_flow_graph.h | 414 ++
> 29 files changed, 9867 insertions(+), 8320 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/common/flow_engine.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/common/flow_util.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow_ethertype.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow_fdir.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow_hash.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_flow_tunnel.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_ethertype.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_fdir.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_hash.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_l2tun.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_ntuple.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_security.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow_syn.c
> create mode 100644 lib/ethdev/rte_flow_graph.h
>
Good to see common code, but this patchset is complex.
AI review found a couple issues that need addressing.
=== Review: [PATCH v3 00/29] Intel PMD common flow handling ===
Review of series from Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
This series refactors flow attribute and action validation across Intel
PMDs (ixgbe, i40e, iavf, ice) into common code in flow_check.h, while
also converting ixgbe flow-related functions from rte_eth_dev to
ixgbe_adapter parameters for multiprocess safety.
Patches 1/29, 2/29, 3/29, 6/29, 7/29, 8/29, 9/29, 10/29, 11/29,
13/29, 14/29, 15/29, 16/29, 17/29, 18/29, 19/29, 20/29, 21/29,
22/29, 23/29, 24/29, 25/29, 26/29, 27/29, 28/29, 29/29: no issues.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Patch 4/29: net/ixgbe: use adapter in flow-related calls
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error: In ixgbe_clear_all_l2_tn_filter(), the macro is called with
the wrong argument:
struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(dev);
This casts the rte_eth_dev pointer directly to ixgbe_adapter, which
is a type confusion. Every other call site in this patch passes
dev->data->dev_private. Should be:
struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(dev->data->dev_private);
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Patch 5/29: net/intel/common: add common flow action parsing
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Error: In __flow_action_check_rss(), the queue/queue_num consistency
check has inverted logic:
if ((q_num == 0) == (rss->queue == NULL)) {
return rte_flow_error_set(error, ...);
}
This errors when q_num and queue are both absent or both present (the
valid cases), and accepts when they are mismatched (the invalid cases).
When q_num > 0 and queue == NULL passes this check, the subsequent
contiguity loop dereferences rss->queue, which is a NULL pointer
dereference.
The key_len/key check immediately below correctly uses != for the same
pattern. Fix:
if ((q_num == 0) != (rss->queue == NULL)) {
Warning: ci_flow_check_actions() returns -EINVAL at the end when
parsed_actions->count is zero (all VOID actions), but does not call
rte_flow_error_set(). Every other error path in that function sets
the flow error. Callers may report a confusing empty error to the
application.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Patch 12/29: net/ixgbe: use common checks in FDIR filters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Warning: ixgbe_fdir_actions_check() rejects DROP+MARK via the check:
if (drop_action != NULL && action != NULL) {
return rte_flow_error_set(..., "Conflicting actions");
}
The old ixgbe_parse_fdir_act_attr() allowed DROP+MARK (set fdirflags
and soft_id together). The new parse functions still contain code to
handle DROP+MARK (setting rule->soft_id from aux_action), but it is
now dead code because the check function rejects the combination
before parsing.
If DROP+MARK was intentionally disallowed, the dead aux_action
handling should be removed from ixgbe_parse_fdir_filter_normal() and
ixgbe_parse_fdir_filter_tunnel(). If it should still be allowed, the
check needs to permit a MARK alongside DROP.
Also, this block in ixgbe_fdir_actions_check() is dead code:
if (drop_action == NULL && action != NULL &&
action->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DROP) {
drop_action = action;
}
DROP is in fwd_actions[], so a DROP as the second action is already
rejected by the preceding "must not be a forwarding action" check.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-12 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-16 17:27 [RFC PATCH v1 00/21] Building a better rte_flow parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/21] ethdev: add flow graph API Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/21] net/intel/common: add flow engines infrastructure Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/21] net/intel/common: add utility functions Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/21] net/ixgbe: add support for common flow parsing Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/21] net/ixgbe: reimplement ethertype parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/21] net/ixgbe: reimplement syn parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/21] net/ixgbe: reimplement L2 tunnel parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/21] net/ixgbe: reimplement ntuple parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/21] net/ixgbe: reimplement security parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/21] net/ixgbe: reimplement FDIR parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/21] net/ixgbe: reimplement hash parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/21] net/i40e: add support for common flow parsing Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/21] net/i40e: reimplement ethertype parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/21] net/i40e: reimplement FDIR parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/21] net/i40e: reimplement tunnel QinQ parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/21] net/i40e: reimplement VXLAN parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/21] net/i40e: reimplement NVGRE parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/21] net/i40e: reimplement MPLS parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/21] net/i40e: reimplement gtp parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/21] net/i40e: reimplement L4 cloud parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-16 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/21] net/i40e: reimplement hash parser Anatoly Burakov
2026-03-17 0:42 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/21] Building a better rte_flow parser Stephen Hemminger
2026-04-12 16:42 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260412094221.4defa766@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox