From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] flow_compile: textual flow rule compiler
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 20:29:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260506033338.480610-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505183917.370281-1-sismis@dyna-nic.com>
Background
----------
Multiple efforts over the past few cycles have tried to make
testpmd's flow rule grammar reusable from outside testpmd.
External applications that need rte_flow want a documented way
to turn human-written rules into the rte_flow_attr/item/action
arrays accepted by rte_flow_create().
The most recent attempt is Lukas Sismis's series, currently at
v12:
http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=37384 (or
most recent thread on dev@dpdk.org)
That series factors testpmd's existing cmdline_flow.c into a
library and updates testpmd to consume it. It works, but
inherits two properties of cmdline_flow.c that I think are worth
avoiding in a reusable library:
- Coupling to librte_cmdline. Even after the v12 split into
a "simple" part and a "cmdline" part, the parser is still
organized around testpmd's command interpreter, and v12 has
cmdline depending on ethdev to break a previous circular
dependency. A library used by daemons, control planes, or
unit tests should not need that.
- Ad-hoc grammar. cmdline_flow.c implements parsing per-token
in long dispatch logic; the grammar emerges from the code
rather than being stated, and adding a new flow item
requires touching the parser.
This RFC explores a different shape and is posted to ask the
list which one is preferred before more work goes into either.
So I started a new green field library for parsing flow rules
(with the help of AI assistance). It is only a few hours old,
but passes tests and passes review.
This series
-----------
lib/flow_compile -- a small new library providing the same
service via a pcap_compile()-style API:
char errbuf[RTE_FLOW_COMPILE_ERRBUF_SIZE];
struct rte_flow_compile *fc = rte_flow_compile(rule, errbuf);
if (fc == NULL)
fail(errbuf); /* "line:col: message" */
rte_flow_compile_create(port_id, fc, &flow_error);
rte_flow_compile_free(fc);
Design properties:
- Hand-rolled lexer + recursive descent parser. No flex/bison.
- Parser is driven entirely by descriptor tables of items and
actions. Adding a new flow item is a table edit, not a
parser change. A custom-setter hook on each field covers
the layouts that do not fit a plain byte range (bitfields,
indirect arrays).
- Dependencies: rte_ethdev and rte_net only. No librte_cmdline,
no flex/bison. Builds clean on Linux, FreeBSD, and Windows.
- Per-allocation rte_zmalloc for spec/mask/last/conf payloads;
rte_flow_compile_free() walks the pattern and action arrays.
ASan/LSan run clean on the autotest.
The grammar follows testpmd's syntax closely so familiar rules
carry over:
ingress pattern eth / ipv4 src is 10.0.0.1 / end
actions queue index 3 / count / end
and is documented as a formal BNF in the programmer's guide
chapter (patch 2).
Initial coverage: eth, vlan, ipv4, ipv6, tcp, udp, vxlan,
port_id, port_representor, represented_port items; drop,
passthru, queue, mark, jump, count, port_id and representor
variants, of_pop_vlan, vxlan_decap actions. Variable-conf
items and actions (RSS, RAW) require custom setters and are
deferred to a follow-up.
What this RFC is *not*
----------------------
Not a replacement for cmdline_flow.c in testpmd. If the shape
here is acceptable, the next step is a separate series adding a
"flow compile <port> <rule>" command in testpmd alongside the
existing parser, so users can adopt the library incrementally
without breaking scripts that depend on the current syntax.
What I'd like feedback on
-------------------------
1. API shape. pcap_compile-style (one string -> opaque object ->
arrays) versus the three-call attr/pattern/actions form
Sismis's v12 exposes. What does your application actually
want?
2. Library placement. Stand-alone at lib/flow_compile/ versus
addition to lib/ethdev. This series treats it as a
control-path parser layered on top of ethdev rather than
part of ethdev itself; v12 places its parser inside ethdev.
3. Table-driven extension model. Is "to add a new flow item,
add a row to the descriptor table" the right contract?
Should the tables live alongside each rte_flow_item_*
definition in rte_flow.h, or in their own file as here?
4. Convergence. If this design is preferred, I'm happy to
coordinate with Lukas to fold in the testpmd-side changes
from his series.
5. API code. Is it readable enough. Lots of code here
but doing lexer/parser is prime template territory
and AI has a good chance here.
Stephen Hemminger (3):
flow_compile: introduce textual flow rule compiler
doc: add programmer's guide for flow rule compiler
test/flow_compile: add unit tests for flow rule compiler
MAINTAINERS | 8 +
app/test/meson.build | 2 +
app/test/test_flow_compile.c | 230 +++
doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_compile_lib.rst | 170 ++
doc/guides/prog_guide/index.rst | 1 +
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_26_07.rst | 5 +
lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_lex.c | 488 +++++
lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_parse.c | 634 ++++++
lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_priv.h | 181 ++
lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_tables.c | 245 +++
lib/flow_compile/meson.build | 15 +
lib/flow_compile/rte_flow_compile.h | 158 ++
lib/flow_compile/rte_flow_compile_api.c | 132 ++
lib/flow_compile/version.map | 13 +
lib/meson.build | 1 +
15 files changed, 2283 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 app/test/test_flow_compile.c
create mode 100644 doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_compile_lib.rst
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_lex.c
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_parse.c
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_priv.h
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_tables.c
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/meson.build
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/rte_flow_compile.h
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/rte_flow_compile_api.c
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/version.map
--
2.43.7
Stephen Hemminger (3):
flow_compile: introduce textual flow rule compiler
doc: add programmer's guide for flow rule compiler
test/flow_compile: add unit tests for flow rule compiler
MAINTAINERS | 7 +
app/test/meson.build | 1 +
app/test/test_flow_compile.c | 234 ++++++++
doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_compile_lib.rst | 272 +++++++++
doc/guides/prog_guide/index.rst | 1 +
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_26_07.rst | 6 +
lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_lex.c | 510 +++++++++++++++++
lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_parse.c | 634 +++++++++++++++++++++
lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_priv.h | 181 ++++++
lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_tables.c | 245 ++++++++
lib/flow_compile/meson.build | 15 +
lib/flow_compile/rte_flow_compile.h | 158 +++++
lib/flow_compile/rte_flow_compile_api.c | 132 +++++
lib/meson.build | 1 +
14 files changed, 2397 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 app/test/test_flow_compile.c
create mode 100644 doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_compile_lib.rst
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_lex.c
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_parse.c
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_priv.h
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/flow_compile_tables.c
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/meson.build
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/rte_flow_compile.h
create mode 100644 lib/flow_compile/rte_flow_compile_api.c
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 18:39 [PATCH v12 0/6] flow_parser: add shared parser library Lukas Sismis
2026-05-05 18:39 ` [PATCH v12 1/6] cmdline: include stddef.h for MSVC compatibility Lukas Sismis
2026-05-05 18:39 ` [PATCH v12 2/6] ethdev: add RSS type helper APIs Lukas Sismis
2026-05-05 18:39 ` [PATCH v12 3/6] ethdev: add flow parser library Lukas Sismis
2026-05-05 18:39 ` [PATCH v12 4/6] app/testpmd: use flow parser from ethdev Lukas Sismis
2026-05-05 18:39 ` [PATCH v12 5/6] examples/flow_parsing: add flow parser demo Lukas Sismis
2026-05-05 18:39 ` [PATCH v12 6/6] test: add flow parser functional tests Lukas Sismis
2026-05-05 18:46 ` [PATCH v12 0/6] flow_parser: add shared parser library Lukáš Šišmiš
2026-05-05 21:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 12:29 ` Lukáš Šišmiš
2026-05-06 3:29 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-05-06 3:29 ` [RFC 1/3] flow_compile: introduce textual flow rule compiler Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-06 8:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-05-06 10:10 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2026-05-06 15:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-06 15:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-05-06 17:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-06 3:29 ` [RFC 2/3] doc: add programmer's guide for " Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-06 3:29 ` [RFC 3/3] test/flow_compile: add unit tests " Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 0:06 ` [RFC v2 0/4] flow_compile: textual " Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 0:06 ` [RFC v2 1/4] config: add support for using flex and bison Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 0:06 ` [RFC v2 2/4] flow_compile: introduce textual flow rule compiler Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 0:06 ` [RFC v2 3/4] doc: add programmer's guide for " Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 0:06 ` [RFC v2 4/4] test/flow_compile: add unit tests " Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 2:54 ` [RFC v2 0/4] flow_compile: textual " Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 8:10 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-05-07 16:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 16:26 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-05-07 16:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260506033338.480610-1-stephen@networkplumber.org \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox