From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1941CD4F3C for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 17:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0F6402D9; Mon, 18 May 2026 19:10:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-dl1-f48.google.com (mail-dl1-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5158040041 for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 19:10:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-dl1-f48.google.com with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-1329fc4bf77so6545904c88.1 for ; Mon, 18 May 2026 10:10:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1779124225; x=1779729025; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=03ZzvszZ/1+tJxCacuglyEPnYA5pY2+33HYPPWWadx8=; b=gWfeGghVImzcRpxp72DuCGi4ZfBozulkBmIrSeBR8OQRH/VleaAMRWV9RsBLmoFboS XexZw40kondStk8+XzfEJTgZ3VsDB6a9ydHmYETh+qLcyUgzjkT6nEd6wsyRyvALccwS 5Sa+Oh1FPYZIuLiUzT0ytqyJWNSaXjjWAUqM30i4+XSKDC83BqmLWkoMC04mOv5wmx+p 0GIcVgvPC8ymECZqMn1sQNG7Pp63dVeUlRWSt5A9WsXFna50glxnMQek4PMfwcO/+RMb j8aCIwe8qkywgoC8XTSvbObZcKXrpi/LUBOpVCHkqRN+uW+FWN3/R8ggISEMTg32jANG XIbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1779124225; x=1779729025; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=03ZzvszZ/1+tJxCacuglyEPnYA5pY2+33HYPPWWadx8=; b=dqKwGY89xs931RnfRMqvGy3mIUqKFSsKC0kBDIv+se0fGTT037eeXH18IqE64gXrRp ZsB0Sp8xU9y2s4QCBHAt6x+OPLkc31wQLiwkV3VI7Bq+qmqqKcO6FrFE+4LX24MA1fde NllINHKQx2EsVrkTAcvDGu8InwU9KopeuKCyGCOJo/6GG55RyGamoRwvlk+fWaQNMBtW T5JH/uzqihMaxgUY6mpz1jhZau01dozBGszxorOActa2r0fWQAUJ4sRMkiwYPGrL6677 AXX13noMxKs2F7Pg3r+k7j/sgquGlW3pgCTpXAcv/uYWOBouRaah9UQhowQP6QusMrcv vVvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx6XD8TQXpSqgzIVFtawrZUB8r0CBX1EQysmYWX3js9OtOEdL7X EG+Azsx8n5YzekQzE//WM5x6XOjmj7gVDDk8nrPV6kqSud7aL2DRkmpwHpNs7fXDWJU= X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OEMuTiXvrucRSQg8g+zeiZKpA0dVg+Stdq5vzelyCooyzLw/x+yVLlYGIH73VF 8KitVbZj1mZQ0wWd+lBwCTuQIG1CaJsDJqpP9xVhVymqSBHXBEqHPLwybkyKmrgkvvoPwmgtbiT sq4usKi6fcZFx+gQip20Ej8PXuCZrsqUM7OjGHJMt9n/k4oa60S1n/dsqpyOQ3i+qcaAsb4BPgk s/UDzesf3Z60z6detuAYyuSh368X2jHxlCPrkY5fUUJeGu6VgwrIAwGzwITwK2yEGphXIZW5X8V oziOwqcnRf7sQXH5Fp3kYrsAIWkcK1jILlAto7Dl7O/ibMo2KWNdmHSxFWidCd3BV7m5CA1Vk9o P5R4foPD6Kgq17cBdgenO/NimP+jQbUTmm9UPCCtOWMYe23VJ4cllpbZN3ldnC+2MbWljmOBtWl 1Ba5t6lgRddinLeGGLHsOjq2DziDy2H6PeKRk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:7022:40d:b0:12d:de3e:cc02 with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-13504a53ff1mr7011264c88.41.1779124225009; Mon, 18 May 2026 10:10:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoenix.local ([104.202.41.210]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a92af1059eb24-134cbcb9ef5sm19996881c88.2.2026.05.18.10.10.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 May 2026 10:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 10:10:22 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Bruce Richardson Cc: , , Jack Bond-Preston , Gavin Hu , "Honnappa Nagarahalli" , Pablo de Lara Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: silence -Wconstant-logical-operand in RTE_IS_POWER_OF_2 Message-ID: <20260518101022.7d665d83@phoenix.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20260518163401.580696-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 18 May 2026 17:56:08 +0100 Bruce Richardson wrote: > I'd also suggest changing the second part of the && to match, changing the > "!" for explicit "== 0": > > #define RTE_IS_POWER_OF_2(n) ((n) != 0 && (((n) - 1) & (n)) == 0) Was heading for the smallest possible part