DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH dpdk v5 4/5] net: parse L3 protocol after MPLS labels
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 11:00:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518110045.719501ce@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518132712.70913-12-rjarry@redhat.com>

On Mon, 18 May 2026 15:27:18 +0200
Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com> wrote:

> rte_net_get_ptype stops at the MPLS layer and never identifies the L3
> protocol of the payload. Also, the label parsing uses a fixed maximum of
> 5 headers instead of checking the bottom of stack bit.
> 
> Use the bottom of stack bit to consume all labels and inspect the first
> nibble of the payload to determine if it is IPv4 or IPv6.
> 
> Add test cases to verify this works. Ensure that an unknown protocol
> after MPLS (e.g. ARP) does not produce a bogus L3 type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com>
> ---
Re: [PATCH dpdk v5 4/5] net: parse L3 protocol after MPLS labels

Info:

The local variable name `nimble` (and its companion `nimble_copy`) appears
to be a typo for `nibble`. A nibble is the standard term for 4 bits, which
is what the code reads and masks against `0xf0`. The commit message itself
uses the correct spelling ("inspect the first nibble of the payload"), so
only the code is affected.

	const uint8_t *nimble;
	uint8_t nimble_copy;
	...
	nimble = rte_pktmbuf_read(m, off, sizeof(*nimble), &nimble_copy);
	if (nimble == NULL)
		return pkt_type;
	switch (*nimble & 0xf0) {

Suggest renaming to `nibble`/`nibble_copy` for clarity.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-18 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-22 10:28 [PATCH dpdk] net: fix L2 ptype assignment in VLAN loop Robin Jarry
2026-04-22 10:35 ` Robin Jarry
2026-04-22 10:38 ` [PATCH dpdk v2] " Robin Jarry
2026-04-22 13:16   ` Thomas Monjalon
2026-04-22 13:18     ` Robin Jarry
2026-04-22 13:23   ` David Marchand
2026-04-22 13:32 ` [PATCH dpdk v3] net: fix VLAN packet type Robin Jarry
2026-04-23  9:19   ` Kevin Traynor
2026-04-23  9:49     ` Robin Jarry
2026-04-23 10:59       ` Kevin Traynor
2026-04-23 11:11         ` Robin Jarry
2026-04-23 11:24 ` [PATCH dpdk v4] " Robin Jarry
2026-04-24 16:18   ` Kevin Traynor
2026-04-25  8:40   ` David Marchand
2026-04-27 10:47     ` Robin Jarry
2026-04-27 15:53       ` Thomas Monjalon
2026-04-30 10:12         ` David Marchand
2026-04-30 11:06           ` Morten Brørup
2026-05-15 11:17     ` Kevin Traynor
2026-05-18 13:27 ` [PATCH dpdk v5 0/5] Fix and improve VLAN/MPLS parsing in rte_net_get_ptype Robin Jarry
2026-05-18 13:27   ` [PATCH dpdk v5 1/5] Revert "net: fix packet type for stacked VLAN" Robin Jarry
2026-05-20  9:47     ` David Marchand
2026-05-20 10:24     ` Kevin Traynor
2026-05-18 13:27   ` [PATCH dpdk v5 2/5] net: support multiple stacked VLAN tags Robin Jarry
2026-05-20  9:56     ` David Marchand
2026-05-18 13:27   ` [PATCH dpdk v5 3/5] net: add unit tests for rte_net_get_ptype Robin Jarry
2026-05-18 13:27   ` [PATCH dpdk v5 4/5] net: parse L3 protocol after MPLS labels Robin Jarry
2026-05-18 18:00     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-05-18 13:27   ` [PATCH dpdk v5 5/5] net: add truncated packet tests for rte_net_get_ptype Robin Jarry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260518110045.719501ce@phoenix.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox