From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8F0CD8CA4 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2026 20:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4819A4067D; Mon, 8 Jun 2026 22:33:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-dl1-f43.google.com (mail-dl1-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5F740666 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2026 22:33:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-dl1-f43.google.com with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-138188a7dccso4929166c88.1 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1780950807; x=1781555607; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=UpomH5xEo1IVmoZUHGsj4pBSAgglM2zOVzI3WrU/n+E=; b=a/mKsSyfO3tXRufE9QeviGmfXaozMnDlMHykRW2lvav3/fA4FMV9CLuQfXVFRD1rsE pkr/ZSkStFwN0d17Nl923vJ9JXiUD0nJOqlXxmW7jLWLNmCtaPbnt5Epn4tTQTjtZQLO ORWsSN8VM9x7zw9XLveIgHkE8y7FTMHduxqZ42tHsrgFCN2NhJnQBvthhoAGB3rz8+Y6 646Tx042dt6NNXAx8IlCMVI6ZRl1fR6qJ8mC67TzXB3pmuPOmcdyIcLOr5GGoDPbGAld LCD+R1gBvlCxH+KKKn2NFQrkQ1zp74T3MLoGAovqWhGvxHu9RF9NdFoNGTqAXBRCCjzF HXNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1780950807; x=1781555607; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UpomH5xEo1IVmoZUHGsj4pBSAgglM2zOVzI3WrU/n+E=; b=SEfycjev1JLhO9VtOjwNHNOV6vxzzjNVAlRI56hAd10Q7OxSckwkhl4IFLzWzOaI80 0sUK+Ao7a4/yCmcIcZJxTDv94z4a6Y/krMF5xdAiXVgEn6HVeWgfAU6i0/T0GauN2S1S qRSmx8LHuvxvd9meO5NBNn8sCi0fwgvkFjA4Avbu6IH5wMcbc6WTlkr/ejL3T7dWQn0/ Vv+WDMU68AOm5lyE0+lv4EIUhlT4In2OLZv9G4nYxEyIm0yvPRYXiezaZxbwXwvUcTk5 aC78sFOBpvkDbtMNbgRzI8b1dKrMVP1wqkU5YQzLG2ObDvXl+BocTWf25Nh6E9YWuUgj 9rrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyyeFpwDyOx1ywpzaLD/mC6p6Njqu4c770UGL9+5uRi0/Y6RBxO s86WuJppAYAxx1mpSj4MPgaX3aayNMO7CKobWamPcA/fCRnSkEWcCj5VJb+Ke7QBQXWRsRS8he6 81YeV X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OFiln28bkQDrhF3BGoywidxTdeamHzZ30vOd27WfUFRUzIbKkDN870xTFqWD12 7V0OxbNTB+/xB5px+CjjpKiKQuJOWkIbQf0m7Bl0r/AHpFmEhNahzpB6F64YTaawR0uyCOUjslX nPcV3MwBfoItmPnzQ7g2C4lwDBxdRRleILVItv3zbabd0LDzKr7CuDev9N8aBnFRBQEbH4kM7wQ QMFXf+zAjCaUSNDQAX8swD7MSVvZKe7eq4GQ4TQEF9GWD9YIfW3/aAC1ZQqp4jIKzzLLSQBXvJm RAYu93zF4cXKZdHMhrxF6lodOw1yv+uTA73rQbGvoeZQ5eu4Z8IcCe0JCE/SOB6KwcHOpxHt80L ZxqYVUuifPH1sM8BK2fkW++QjmKpAZxt2qOLofm+IwJX7xeB3KCNG1wpnanxmHvk53DzYjun9Br ZAZH+y56MeA64CX0PuQmZJ4OvHAFpLEbajL/W8rm0dTl7TqlMennixNn7ijL0f3mhTuUYTV3PEe AF0i0dztXg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:7301:4342:b0:2da:4216:7ea3 with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-3077b08e49fmr8955379eec.14.1780950807167; Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoenix.lan (204-195-96-226.wavecable.com. [204.195.96.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-3074db560d7sm25804178eec.5.2026.06.08.13.33.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:33:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Konstantin Ananyev , Marat Khalili Subject: [PATCH 2/4] test: bpf check that JIT was generated Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 13:28:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20260608203322.1116296-3-stephen@networkplumber.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260608203322.1116296-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20260608203322.1116296-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Avoid silently ignoring JIT failures. The test cases should all succeed JIT compilation; if not it is a bug in the JIT implementation and should be reported. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger --- app/test/test_bpf.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/app/test/test_bpf.c b/app/test/test_bpf.c index dd24722450..79d547dc82 100644 --- a/app/test/test_bpf.c +++ b/app/test/test_bpf.c @@ -3508,6 +3508,14 @@ run_test(const struct bpf_test *tst) rv, strerror(rv)); } } +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86_64) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64) + else { + /* a JIT backend exists for this arch, so it must compile */ + printf("%s@%d: %s: no JIT code generated;\n", + __func__, __LINE__, tst->name); + ret = -1; + } +#endif rte_bpf_destroy(bpf); return ret; -- 2.53.0