From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] alternative capture mechanism
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 07:28:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616072825.6b464f84@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajFDjhDc5hXhE8km@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:37:34 +0100
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 02:02:01PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > This is an RFC for an alternative way to capture packets from a DPDK
> > application. I did brief demo of similar mechanism at DPDK summit but
> > this is more complete. Capture runs in the primary process and is driven
> > entirely over telemetry; no secondary process is involved.
> >
> > A client asks the application to start capturing and passes it a file
> > descriptor to write to. The application writes pcapng to that descriptor.
> > A Wireshark extcap script is the intended front end, but the control path
> > is just telemetry and the output is just a pipe, so other front ends are
> > possible.
> >
> > 1/4 telemetry: let a command receive file descriptors from the client
> > 2/4 capture: the library
> > 3/4 test: functional test
> > 4/4 app: the Wireshark extcap script and its documentation
> >
> > Setup and usage are in doc/guides/tools/wireshark_extcap.rst.
> >
> > Primary process only for now; secondary-process capture is possible as
> > follow-on. Posting as RFC to get feedback on the approach.
> >
> > The extcap script is dual licensed (BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0-or-later) as
> > it may be more useful in the Wireshark tree.
> >
>
> One concern I have though - does this cause system-calls to be made in the
> fast-path because we are writting to a passed in FD? For performance
> reasons, would it not be better to use a memory buffer for this, thereby
> avoiding syscalls? For example, rather than passing in an FD to telemetry,
> we could pass in a key to be passed to shmget (going old-school!), or
> name parameter for shm_open. Thereafter with the memory buffer we can use a
> circular ring or similar to pass the data from app to client.
>
> /Bruce
The system calls are contained inside the thread spawned when capture starts.
The flow is:
callback -> ring -> capture thread -> FIFO -> wireshark
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 21:02 [RFC 0/4] alternative capture mechanism Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-09 21:02 ` [RFC 1/4] telemetry: allow commands to receive file descriptors Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 12:32 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-06-16 14:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-09 21:02 ` [RFC 2/4] capture: infrastructure wireshark packet capture Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-09 21:02 ` [RFC 3/4] test: add test for capture hooks Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-09 21:02 ` [RFC 4/4] usertools/dpdk-wireshark-extcap.py: script for external capture Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 12:37 ` [RFC 0/4] alternative capture mechanism Bruce Richardson
2026-06-16 14:28 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616072825.6b464f84@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox