DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] eal: notify secondaries on primary exit
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:09:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260618090940.6853e9cb@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507210152.410419-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>

On Thu,  7 May 2026 13:58:35 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:

> Bugzilla 1942: when a primary process exits cleanly, secondary
> processes other than testpmd do not get notified.  The notification
> mechanism added in 25.11 was placed in testpmd and used
> rte_mp_request_sync() with a testpmd-specific action name, so any
> non-testpmd secondary (dpdk-dumpcap, dpdk-pdump, dpdk-procinfo, or
> out-of-tree consumers) would log "Cannot find action: mp_testpmd"
> and the primary would block on the 5 second request timeout.
> 
> Putting application-specific IPC actions on a broadcast request path
> is the wrong layer.  Notification of primary exit is something every
> secondary needs and should come from EAL, not from each application.
> 
> Patch 1 reverts the testpmd-side mechanism (commit f96273c8e9d3).
> The secondary-side primary alive monitor (enable_primary_monitor)
> is preserved and continues to handle detection of primary exit via
> the existing alarm-based polling of rte_eal_primary_proc_alive().
> 
> Patch 2 adds a generic EAL-level notification.  On primary cleanup,
> rte_mp_channel_cleanup() broadcasts an MP_REQ_QUIT message to all
> known secondaries via rte_mp_sendmsg().  Secondaries register an
> internal action handler that tears down their own MP channel on
> receipt.  No new public API; no application changes required for
> any secondary, in-tree or out.
> 
> This is the minimum fix suitable for backport to 25.11 stable.
> It addresses the clean exit case.  The crash case (primary killed
> or signaled) continues to be handled by the existing
> rte_eal_primary_proc_alive() polling on the secondary side, which
> detects the primary's release of the config file lock.
> 
> A more complete solution using a connected socket type (SOCK_SEQPACKET)
> is planned since that can handle both planned and forced exiting
> of the primary.
> 
> Tested with testpmd (primary) and dpdk-dumpcap, dpdk-pdump,
> dpdk-procinfo (secondaries).
> 
> 
> Stephen Hemminger (2):
>   Revert "app/testpmd: stop forwarding in secondary process"
>   eal: notify secondary on primary exit
> 
>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c           | 103 ++-----------------------------
>  lib/eal/common/eal_common_proc.c |  51 ++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
> 

This is a real bug fix. Even if AI is being overly wordy in describing
it; what it does is move the notification from being testpmd -> testpmd only
to a more general primary -> secondary mechanism.

Without it can demonstrate the bug rather trivially with packet
capture tools (pdump or dumpcap)

Could this get reviewed?

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-18 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-07 20:58 [PATCH 0/2] eal: notify secondaries on primary exit Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 20:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "app/testpmd: stop forwarding in secondary process" Stephen Hemminger
2026-05-07 20:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] eal: notify secondary on primary exit Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-18 16:09 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260618090940.6853e9cb@phoenix.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox