From: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] net/enetc: fix TX BDs flag overwrite issue
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:14:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260619184427.522518-3-g.singh@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260619184427.522518-1-g.singh@nxp.com>
Zero the flags field before setting offload bits and set the
frame-last flag (F) after all descriptor fields are written.
This prevents stale flag bits from a previous packet corrupting
the current descriptor.
Fixes: 72f491f1e53c ("net/enetc: optimize ENETC4 data path")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>
---
drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
index a2b8153..b44e6f3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/enetc/enetc_rxtx.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
- * Copyright 2018-2024 NXP
+ * Copyright 2018-2026 NXP
*/
#include <stdbool.h>
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ enetc_xmit_pkts_nc(void *tx_queue,
dcbf(data + j);
txbd = ENETC_TXBD(*tx_ring, i);
- txbd->flags = rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC4_TXBD_FLAGS_F);
+ txbd->flags = 0;
if (tx_ring->q_swbd[i].buffer_addr->ol_flags & ENETC4_TX_CKSUM_OFFLOAD_MASK)
enetc4_tx_offload_checksum(tx_ring->q_swbd[i].buffer_addr, txbd);
@@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ enetc_xmit_pkts_nc(void *tx_queue,
txbd->addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)
rte_cpu_to_le_64((size_t)tx_swbd->buffer_addr->buf_iova +
tx_swbd->buffer_addr->data_off);
+ txbd->flags |= rte_cpu_to_le_16(ENETC4_TXBD_FLAGS_F);
i++;
start++;
if (unlikely(i == tx_ring->bd_count))
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 18:44 [PATCH 00/10] NXP ENETC driver related changes Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 01/10] net/enetc: fix TX BD structure Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` Gagandeep Singh [this message]
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 03/10] net/enetc: fix queue initialization Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] net/enetc: support ESP packet type in packet parsing Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 05/10] net/enetc: update random MAC generation code Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] net/enetc: support scatter-gather Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] net/enetc: add option to disable VSI messaging Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] net/enetc: add devargs to control VSI-PSI timeout and delay Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 09/10] net/enetc: set user configurable priority to TX rings Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 18:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] net/enetc4: add cacheable BD ring support with SW cache maintenance Gagandeep Singh
2026-06-19 21:43 ` [PATCH 00/10] NXP ENETC driver related changes Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260619184427.522518-3-g.singh@nxp.com \
--to=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox