From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com>
Cc: Mark Blasko <blasko@google.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>,
Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@redhat.com>,
"Jasper Tran O'Leary" <jtranoleary@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/af_xdp: add Rx metadata and dynamic timestamping support
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 13:02:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260629130205.5ed0e44b@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALuQH+W4wPA5ygZ63pcQrCD-Uz_K1AsN9n+fzX+ESarmaHnmrA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 29 Jun 2026 12:10:27 -0700
Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com> wrote:
> These are all very good points for ensuring an airtight abstraction.
> However, I'd like to note that neither of the kernel-bound PMD
> interfaces (pcap, AF_PACKET) have support for the `read_clock` op. I
> am not certain of the reason for this, but I suspect it's because
> ethtool IOCTLs already cover that functionality. This patch's
> implementation follows the other implementations pretty closely,
> differing only in how the timestamp is extracted.
Yes, that needs to be fixed :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 21:53 [PATCH] net/af_xdp: add Rx metadata and dynamic timestamping support Mark Blasko
2026-06-23 22:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-29 0:50 ` Mark Blasko
2026-06-29 17:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-29 19:10 ` Joshua Washington
2026-06-29 20:02 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-06-29 20:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-30 0:41 ` Joshua Washington
2026-07-10 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/af_xdp: add Rx timestamping and read_clock support Mark Blasko
2026-07-10 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net/af_xdp: add af_xdp rx metadata and dynamic timestamping support Mark Blasko
2026-07-10 22:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/af_xdp: add read_clock support to AF_XDP PMD Mark Blasko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260629130205.5ed0e44b@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=blasko@google.com \
--cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=joshwash@google.com \
--cc=jtranoleary@google.com \
--cc=mtahhan@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox