From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Su Sai <spiderdetective.ss@gmail.com>
Cc: marat.khalili@huawei.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [v4] net/cksum: compute raw cksum for several segments
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 07:41:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703074132.2a718abe@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260618063242.99189-1-spiderdetective.ss@gmail.com>
On Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:32:42 +0800
Su Sai <spiderdetective.ss@gmail.com> wrote:
> The rte_raw_cksum_mbuf function is used to compute
> the raw checksum of a packet.
> If the packet payload stored in multi mbuf, the function
> will goto the hard case. In hard case,
> the variable 'tmp' is a type of uint32_t,
> so rte_bswap16 will drop high 16 bit.
> Meanwhile, the variable 'sum' is a type of uint32_t,
> so 'sum += tmp' will drop the carry when overflow.
> Both drop will make cksum incorrect.
> This commit fixes the above bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su Sai <spiderdetective.ss@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
> ---
Still one error in the test.
Error — double-free in test_l4_cksum_multi_mbufs() (app/test/test_cksum.c)
The segments are chained into one packet (rte_pktmbuf_chain sets
m[0]->next = m[1], m[1]->next = m[2]), but cleanup then calls
rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(m, segs_len) over the array.
rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk walks the ->next chain of each array element, so
index 0 frees the entire chain (m[0], m[1], m[2]), and indices 1 and 2
then free m[1]/m[2] a second time. This fires on the normal success
path every run, and on the fail path whenever ≥2 segments were chained
— a debug/ASAN build will abort on the sanity check, and a normal build
corrupts pool accounting. The array-of-independent-mbufs contract that
free_bulk expects doesn't hold here because the elements alias one
chain. Free the chain once through its head:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-31 9:55 [PATCH] net/cksum: compute raw cksum for several segments 苏赛
2025-07-31 10:51 ` Marat Khalili
2025-07-31 11:03 ` Marat Khalili
2025-07-31 11:31 ` [External] " Su Sai
2025-07-31 11:43 ` Marat Khalili
2025-07-31 11:46 ` Marat Khalili
2025-07-31 12:22 ` zhoumin
2025-08-01 7:26 ` Su Sai
2025-08-01 15:28 ` [v2] " Su Sai
2025-08-01 16:39 ` Marat Khalili
2025-08-02 11:08 ` [v3] " Su Sai
2025-08-03 16:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-04 3:54 ` Su Sai
2025-08-05 8:55 ` Marat Khalili
2026-02-20 15:49 ` Marat Khalili
2026-02-20 17:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2026-02-20 18:17 ` Marat Khalili
2026-02-20 18:35 ` Marat Khalili
2026-02-27 6:36 ` su sai
2026-02-27 7:31 ` su sai
2026-03-06 15:17 ` Marat Khalili
2025-08-11 14:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-08-12 3:03 ` su sai
2026-02-20 17:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-08 17:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-06-16 12:30 ` [v4] " Su Sai
2026-06-16 12:38 ` Su Sai
2026-06-17 20:02 ` Marat Khalili
2026-06-18 6:32 ` Su Sai
2026-07-03 14:41 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-06-18 6:37 ` su sai
2026-06-16 12:48 ` [v3] " su sai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260703074132.2a718abe@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=marat.khalili@huawei.com \
--cc=spiderdetective.ss@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox