From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: datshan@qq.com
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, aconole@redhat.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devtools: support local opencode agent for patch review
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2026 09:46:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260704094600.3dcf165b@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_4A299B76E71AE508AF5D403AFDA4B248B708@qq.com>
On Fri, 3 Jul 2026 17:19:02 +0800
datshan@qq.com wrote:
> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>
> Currently review-patch.py only supports cloud AI providers
> (Anthropic, OpenAI, xAI, Google) via REST API, requiring API keys.
>
> Add a --via option that invokes the locally installed opencode CLI as
> the review runner instead of making HTTP calls. opencode reads
> AGENTS.md from the DPDK project directory automatically, needing no
> configuration beyond opencode on PATH.
>
> The --via and -p/--provider options are independent -- via routes to
> the local agent mode while -p continues to use the cloud API path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> ---
So most of this script was AI generated, turned back to AI
to look at this change...
Thanks for the patch - the opencode integration looks sound. The
--format json parsing matches what the CLI actually emits, and the
_run_review refactor is a clean way to share the dispatch. A few items:
Bug:
- subprocess.run() can raise TimeoutExpired, but only FileNotFoundError
is caught, so a timeout gives a raw traceback. Catch
subprocess.TimeoutExpired and route it through error() like the cloud
path does.
Please clarify / fix:
- -a/--agents is silently ignored in --via mode; opencode auto-loads
AGENTS.md from --dir, which you set to the repo root while AGENTS.md
lives under devtools/ai/. Does opencode actually find the guidelines?
If not the review runs without them.
- JSON metadata still reports "provider": args.provider (stays
"anthropic" under --via); use (args.via or args.provider) as you
already did for the token summary.
- --large-file modes are silently skipped in via mode - intended? A
warning would help.
Nits: non-ASCII em-dash in a prompt string (use --); the trailing "--"
before the message is unnecessary and may drop the prompt; redundant
import tempfile; unused max_tokens param; f-string with no placeholder;
run black on the full_message assignment.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-04 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 9:19 [PATCH] devtools: support local opencode agent for patch review datshan
2026-07-04 16:46 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260704094600.3dcf165b@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=datshan@qq.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox