From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 26.11 1/4] test/cfgfile: improve coverage for listing APIs
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 17:23:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706162348.460489-2-bruce.richardson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706162348.460489-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Improve cfgfile unit-test coverage for listing/index APIs, by adding
assertions for section and entry listing behavior, including:
* expected count validation
* listing sections and entries and checking expected results
* index-based listing checks
* sentinel verification to ensure only expected slots are written
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
app/test/test_cfgfile.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_cfgfile.c b/app/test/test_cfgfile.c
index 1e56473064..2f1c8ec423 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cfgfile.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cfgfile.c
@@ -93,7 +93,14 @@ static int
test_cfgfile_sample1(void)
{
struct rte_cfgfile *cfgfile;
+ struct rte_cfgfile_entry entries[4];
char filename[PATH_MAX];
+ char sec0[CFG_NAME_LEN] = {0};
+ char sec1[CFG_NAME_LEN] = {0};
+ char sec2[CFG_NAME_LEN] = "sentinel_section_2";
+ char sec3[CFG_NAME_LEN] = "sentinel_section_3";
+ char index_sec[CFG_NAME_LEN] = {0};
+ char *sections[] = { sec0, sec1, sec2, sec3 };
int ret;
ret = make_tmp_file(filename, "sample1", sample1_ini);
@@ -105,6 +112,52 @@ test_cfgfile_sample1(void)
ret = _test_cfgfile_sample(cfgfile);
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to validate sample file: %d", ret);
+ ret = rte_cfgfile_num_sections(cfgfile, NULL, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret == 2, "Unexpected number of sections: %d", ret);
+
+ ret = rte_cfgfile_sections(cfgfile, sections, 4);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret == 2, "Unexpected listed sections: %d", ret);
+ TEST_ASSERT(strcmp(sec0, "section1") == 0,
+ "Unexpected section at index 0: %s", sec0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(strcmp(sec1, "section2") == 0,
+ "Unexpected section at index 1: %s", sec1);
+ TEST_ASSERT(strcmp(sec2, "sentinel_section_2") == 0,
+ "Unexpected write past listed sections at index 2: %s", sec2);
+ TEST_ASSERT(strcmp(sec3, "sentinel_section_3") == 0,
+ "Unexpected write past listed sections at index 3: %s", sec3);
+
+ ret = rte_cfgfile_section_num_entries_by_index(cfgfile, index_sec, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret == 1, "Unexpected entry count at index 0: %d", ret);
+ TEST_ASSERT(strcmp(index_sec, "section1") == 0,
+ "Unexpected section name at index 0: %s", index_sec);
+
+ ret = rte_cfgfile_section_num_entries(cfgfile, "section2");
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret == 2, "Unexpected section2 entry count: %d", ret);
+
+ memset(entries, 0x5a, sizeof(entries));
+ ret = rte_cfgfile_section_entries(cfgfile, "section2", entries, 4);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret == 2, "Unexpected section2 entry count: %d", ret);
+ TEST_ASSERT(strcmp(entries[0].name, "key2") == 0,
+ "Unexpected section2 first key: %s", entries[0].name);
+ TEST_ASSERT(strcmp(entries[0].value, "value2") == 0,
+ "Unexpected section2 first value: %s", entries[0].value);
+ TEST_ASSERT(strcmp(entries[1].name, "key3") == 0,
+ "Unexpected section2 second key: %s", entries[1].name);
+ TEST_ASSERT(strcmp(entries[1].value, "value3") == 0,
+ "Unexpected section2 second value: %s", entries[1].value);
+ TEST_ASSERT((unsigned char)entries[2].name[0] == 0x5a,
+ "Unexpected write past listed entries at index 2");
+ TEST_ASSERT((unsigned char)entries[3].name[0] == 0x5a,
+ "Unexpected write past listed entries at index 3");
+
+ memset(entries, 0x5a, sizeof(entries));
+ memset(index_sec, 0, sizeof(index_sec));
+ ret = rte_cfgfile_section_entries_by_index(cfgfile, 1, index_sec, entries, 4);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret == 2,
+ "Unexpected entry count for section at index 1: %d", ret);
+ TEST_ASSERT(strcmp(index_sec, "section2") == 0,
+ "Unexpected section name at index 1: %s", index_sec);
+
ret = rte_cfgfile_close(cfgfile);
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to close cfgfile");
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 16:23 [PATCH 26.11 0/4] extra unit tests for cfgfile library Bruce Richardson
2026-07-06 16:23 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2026-07-06 16:23 ` [PATCH 26.11 2/4] test/cfgfile: validate config creation APIs Bruce Richardson
2026-07-06 16:23 ` [PATCH 26.11 3/4] test/cfgfile: verify file modification API Bruce Richardson
2026-07-06 16:23 ` [PATCH 26.11 4/4] test/cfgfile: test for long lines in file Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706162348.460489-2-bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox