From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7D0C4451B for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2026 09:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070E040290; Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:18:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com (mail-pl1-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B894028A for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 11:25:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2cacb8416a1so25054755ad.1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:25:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1783934741; x=1784539541; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=K14u1PvfB9yNqABgK/cNpbYp9562A+/0qNqCASnkTiw=; b=XhrzBAASf9jYO1oQ0ZL4h/iGfW1XwSiCm2vtlHyZvZaVYXRfKZKQum7NzvOwlHJSkA vRQSbLfyCQY5GunLLI/nI9fZ0UkA74mzR0Ga8334m+pH7k2RTQx/sq4ZfRQ7fBktSSOF dKD1z0XGM4aabo1ueP3+DlNEuSj4h4AiLGHerk5dk4GA4KfahLv6sv1XFuWSRvjt8+yO 9AX7m0LPFaILt6xmrMfP7YkXh6fRzr/qU4kOnnBQLlXbHVPs3dbKBra8qObXmF31/ckL xJKcQeYzBydtog2sWGTTFfQKDNWpXTCT4pUwqez2lcAO8bkeiUjulXVhP/YLQ7WzG5Aa 1TXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1783934741; x=1784539541; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=K14u1PvfB9yNqABgK/cNpbYp9562A+/0qNqCASnkTiw=; b=JeVLU6BP4/8+rnEu0zOfEy5pZIVENaDjSnP4sqrDMhmR3dnJ96CyJojRMPplH334vA 1G771JHF5EeztTfdJvz/W56SBu4ih5+HKbNWNEussFl6pmECv4c/DmIKrnDAMTD/SFUq ghw20l94rMdODkW2lrPdNTe4C5czJDHMPymg0eXdh0GaXLe+WlYABVehTc1mjQHeNtN+ IIz7KVeUMJxOqiewz8vEEfCsj/QD14Bq87tvG/rkFutGBTqGCqVcN/KJFHAiOHGC8w98 fC+tirz+G2wmD34+eOXS0bAGYpdPlY1yUW+Wj+XmfG959+caQgCY7y6k81VWO4uWYVdm rgeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw7MwnFh/o4VoHGCNiH1IAmE/tkx3ui2KLeX+ARchCIlHcTLKJD p50bwMPIkTk6lgdD0Rx+YtfEPsJRrbFMZaseGu1bmunxBfPZpr7LlLOzEywS4afv4WM= X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7ckjnzbbs+59nY/hWHPtTDrIRyL/wSBF5irP5dTtz2eAkLcxhghTkOWloqWXc3e weW4GavLlHANKJfFSbSignWPqyGU0waqeoxDaZ5VHpxV5Y+1aKXyB/lP8e4pg5+ej0bEVHCBIZk 8Gw06umDLQLbkHQPAhL0lDbkgj+nk/S1Hljz83La2oQVIvOzP1wjbVDOEv+8Afy4+kzhPrb8o7Y F7D+lBbobzKzzyQyApdswhJeXSroUPZLbCdVLzltu1kozeMFXG7eigosx0AzxKIie/q0ySjIG1w XT+Q1qPFR0Xcyi8Krx3N//Dl3uOD0FZNFvcAcDJiSZ2G4/gzlovXUdc1RIGgcC8e0TAI6J8A4CP d7LvS7lq7xeRstR6CmqpL1M+NwRLBSwXn/2c5QZsSrw7CC1cJnxV8N7f+UDF6bf/LdkqulgDIEp XOrPGtj/pmZoIk2ZhP3VXFMtnC X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:40ce:b0:2c9:2ee6:693e with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2ce9ec11cb8mr79614915ad.18.1783934741334; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dev-template-2404.. ([192.19.252.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2ccc9bf77e4sm95900285ad.22.2026.07.13.02.25.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:25:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Samar Yadav To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: chenbox@nvidia.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, stable@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net/virtio-user: fix eventfd sharing in secondary process Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 09:25:16 +0000 Message-ID: <20260713092517.1631685-1-samaryadav5@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20260703102530.133813-1-samaryadav5@gmail.com> References: <20260703102530.133813-1-samaryadav5@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:18:11 +0200 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi Maxime, Stephen, Gentle ping on this one. v2 addressed the rte_calloc() and rte_thread_mutex_init_shared() feedback from the initial review, and v3 cleaned up a few style items (include ordering, named constants) flagged by the automated review. CI is green apart from the automated review warning, which I've checked against the actual code and don't believe blocks anything. Let me know if there's anything else needed on my end. Thanks, Samar Yadav