From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 02/10] test/bpf: add JSET test with small immediate
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:05:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722183351.633025-3-stephen@networkplumber.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722183351.633025-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
The existing jump test only used a 32-bit JSET mask,
so the broken imm8 encoding of TEST in the x86 JIT was never exercised.
Add a case with a byte-sized mask;
run_test() runs it through the interpreter and the JIT.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
---
app/test/test_bpf.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_bpf.c b/app/test/test_bpf.c
index 3205afaa63..f4286bcefe 100644
--- a/app/test/test_bpf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_bpf.c
@@ -3229,7 +3229,89 @@ test_int64min_umod_uint64max_check(uint64_t rc, const void *arg)
}
/* all bpf test cases */
+/*
+ * JSET with a byte-sized mask: exercises the imm8 path of the TEST
+ * encoding in the x86 JIT (a 32-bit mask takes a different path).
+ */
+static const struct ebpf_insn test_jset1_prog[] = {
+ {
+ .code = (BPF_ALU | EBPF_MOV | BPF_K),
+ .dst_reg = EBPF_REG_0,
+ .imm = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .code = (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B),
+ .dst_reg = EBPF_REG_2,
+ .src_reg = EBPF_REG_1,
+ .off = offsetof(struct dummy_offset, u8),
+ },
+ /* bit 0 is set in the input: branch is taken */
+ {
+ .code = (BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K),
+ .dst_reg = EBPF_REG_2,
+ .imm = 0x1,
+ .off = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .code = (BPF_JMP | BPF_JA),
+ .off = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .code = (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_K),
+ .dst_reg = EBPF_REG_0,
+ .imm = 0x1,
+ },
+ /* bit 1 is clear in the input: branch is not taken */
+ {
+ .code = (BPF_JMP | BPF_JSET | BPF_K),
+ .dst_reg = EBPF_REG_2,
+ .imm = 0x2,
+ .off = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .code = (BPF_JMP | BPF_JA),
+ .off = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .code = (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_OR | BPF_K),
+ .dst_reg = EBPF_REG_0,
+ .imm = 0x2,
+ },
+ {
+ .code = (BPF_JMP | EBPF_EXIT),
+ },
+};
+
+static void
+test_jset1_prepare(void *arg)
+{
+ struct dummy_offset *df = arg;
+
+ memset(df, 0, sizeof(*df));
+ df->u8 = 0x1; /* bit 0 set, bit 1 clear */
+}
+
+static int
+test_jset1_check(uint64_t rc, const void *arg)
+{
+ return cmp_res(__func__, 0x1, rc, arg, arg, 0);
+}
+
static const struct bpf_test tests[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "test_jset1",
+ .arg_sz = sizeof(struct dummy_offset),
+ .prm = {
+ .ins = test_jset1_prog,
+ .nb_ins = RTE_DIM(test_jset1_prog),
+ .prog_arg = {
+ .type = RTE_BPF_ARG_PTR,
+ .size = sizeof(struct dummy_offset),
+ },
+ },
+ .prepare = test_jset1_prepare,
+ .check_result = test_jset1_check,
+ },
{
.name = "test_store1",
.arg_sz = sizeof(struct dummy_offset),
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <0260608203322.1116296-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
2026-07-22 16:05 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] bpf: bug fixes Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-22 16:05 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] bpf/x86: fix JIT encoding of fixed-width immediates Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-22 16:05 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-07-22 16:05 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] bpf: mask shift count in interpreter per RFC 9669 Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-22 16:05 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] bpf/arm64: mask shift count " Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-22 16:05 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] test/bpf: add test for large shift Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-22 16:05 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] bpf/arm64: fix offset type to allow a negative jump Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-22 16:05 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] bpf/arm64: add BPF_ABS/BPF_IND packet load support Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-22 16:05 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] test/bpf: check that JIT was generated Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-22 16:05 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] test/bpf: check that bpf_convert can be JIT'd Stephen Hemminger
2026-07-22 16:05 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] bpf: fix uninitialized warning Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260722183351.633025-3-stephen@networkplumber.org \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=marat.khalili@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox