DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>
Subject: [RFC v2 04/16] bus/dpaa: support unplug and use generic cleanup
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 09:49:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917074917.595603-5-david.marchand@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917074917.595603-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>

Add .unplug callback to handle driver removal and interrupt cleanup.
This enables use of the generic bus cleanup helper while preserving
bus-specific cleanup (portal finish, global init reset).

The cleanup function was already performing these operations, so it
seems safe to expose them through the unplug operation.

Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
---
 doc/guides/rel_notes/release_26_11.rst |  4 ++
 drivers/bus/dpaa/dpaa_bus.c            | 56 +++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_26_11.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_26_11.rst
index 4b3e5d995c..7a5a0c55cb 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_26_11.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_26_11.rst
@@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ New Features
      Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
      =======================================================
 
+* **Added unplug operation support to DPAA bus.**
+
+  Implemented device unplug operation to allow runtime removal of DPAA devices.
+
 
 Removed Items
 -------------
diff --git a/drivers/bus/dpaa/dpaa_bus.c b/drivers/bus/dpaa/dpaa_bus.c
index ef904a7192..bb1c379dfd 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/dpaa/dpaa_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/dpaa/dpaa_bus.c
@@ -798,38 +798,46 @@ dpaa_bus_probe_device(struct rte_driver *drv, struct rte_device *dev)
 }
 
 static int
-dpaa_bus_cleanup(struct rte_bus *bus)
+dpaa_bus_unplug_device(struct rte_device *rte_dev)
 {
-	struct rte_dpaa_device *dev;
-	int error = 0;
+	const struct rte_dpaa_driver *drv = RTE_BUS_DRIVER(rte_dev->driver, *drv);
+	struct rte_dpaa_device *dev = RTE_BUS_DEVICE(rte_dev, *dev);
 
-	BUS_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
-	RTE_BUS_FOREACH_DEV(dev, bus) {
-		const struct rte_dpaa_driver *drv;
+	if (drv->remove != NULL) {
 		int ret;
 
-		if (!rte_dev_is_probed(&dev->device))
-			goto next;
-		drv = RTE_BUS_DRIVER(dev->device.driver, *drv);
-		if (drv->remove == NULL)
-			goto next;
 		ret = drv->remove(dev);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			rte_errno = errno;
-			error = -1;
-			goto next;
-		}
-		dev->device.driver = NULL;
-next:
-		dpaa_close_intr(dev->intr_handle);
-		rte_intr_instance_free(dev->intr_handle);
-		dev->intr_handle = NULL;
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
 	}
+
+	dpaa_close_intr(dev->intr_handle);
+	rte_intr_instance_free(dev->intr_handle);
+	dev->intr_handle = NULL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+dpaa_bus_free_device(struct rte_device *dev)
+{
+	free(RTE_BUS_DEVICE(dev, struct rte_dpaa_device));
+}
+
+static int
+dpaa_bus_cleanup(struct rte_bus *bus)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	BUS_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
+
+	ret = rte_bus_generic_cleanup(bus);
+
 	dpaa_portal_finish((void *)DPAA_PER_LCORE_PORTAL);
 	dpaa_bus_global_init = 0;
 	DPAA_BUS_DEBUG("Bus cleanup done");
 
-	return error;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /* Adding destructor for double check in case non-gracefully
@@ -855,14 +863,16 @@ RTE_FINI_PRIO(dpaa_cleanup, 102)
 static struct rte_bus rte_dpaa_bus = {
 	.scan = rte_dpaa_bus_scan,
 	.probe = rte_bus_generic_probe,
+	.free_device = dpaa_bus_free_device,
+	.cleanup = dpaa_bus_cleanup,
 	.parse = rte_dpaa_bus_parse,
 	.dev_compare = dpaa_bus_dev_compare,
 	.find_device = rte_bus_generic_find_device,
 	.get_iommu_class = rte_dpaa_get_iommu_class,
 	.match = dpaa_bus_match,
 	.probe_device = dpaa_bus_probe_device,
+	.unplug_device = dpaa_bus_unplug_device,
 	.dev_iterate = rte_bus_generic_dev_iterate,
-	.cleanup = dpaa_bus_cleanup,
 };
 
 static struct rte_dpaa_bus_private dpaa_bus = {
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-17  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-23 13:53 [RFC 00/11] Device unplug and bus cleanup refactoring for NXP David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 01/11] drivers/bus: cleanup device freeing in NXP bus scan David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 02/11] bus/dpaa: allocate interrupt during probing David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 03/11] bus/dpaa: support unplug and use generic cleanup David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 04/11] bus/fslmc: fix memory leaks in scan David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 05/11] bus/fslmc: fix per type device count David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 06/11] bus/fslmc: simplify device parsing in scan David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 07/11] bus/fslmc: refactor device filtering for multiprocess David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 08/11] bus/fslmc: move unplug for some device out of VFIO David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 09/11] bus/fslmc: call VFIO setup for some device from bus layer David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 10/11] bus/fslmc: allocate interrupt during probing David Marchand
2026-07-23 13:53 ` [RFC 11/11] bus/fslmc: use generic cleanup David Marchand
2026-07-23 14:11 ` [RFC 00/11] Device unplug and bus cleanup refactoring for NXP Hemant Agrawal
2026-09-03 13:30   ` David Marchand
2026-09-08 14:20     ` Hemant Agrawal
2026-09-10 11:54       ` David Marchand
2026-08-11 20:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-09-17  7:49 ` [RFC v2 00/16] " David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 01/16] drivers/bus: cleanup device freeing in NXP bus scan David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 02/16] drivers/bus: fix FD leak during scan in NXP drivers David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 03/16] bus/dpaa: allocate interrupt during probing David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` David Marchand [this message]
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 05/16] bus/fslmc: fix device name leak David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 06/16] bus/fslmc: fix memory leaks in scan David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 07/16] bus/fslmc: fix per type device count David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 08/16] bus/fslmc: fix some VFIO device FD and memory leaks David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 09/16] bus/fslmc: fix interrupt leak in DPIO cleanup David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 10/16] bus/fslmc: simplify device parsing in scan David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 11/16] bus/fslmc: release resources on scan failure David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 12/16] bus/fslmc: refactor device filtering for multiprocess David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 13/16] bus/fslmc: move unplug for some device out of VFIO David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 14/16] bus/fslmc: call VFIO setup for some device from bus layer David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 15/16] bus/fslmc: allocate interrupt during probing David Marchand
2026-09-17  7:49   ` [RFC v2 16/16] bus/fslmc: use generic cleanup David Marchand
2026-09-24  6:46   ` [RFC v2 00/16] Device unplug and bus cleanup refactoring for NXP David Marchand
2026-09-24  6:53     ` Hemant Agrawal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260917074917.595603-5-david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox