DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] examples: add Wycheproof validation app
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 09:26:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922092614.3c9aacf9@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922160557.2789446-1-kai.ji@intel.com>

On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:05:57 +0000
Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com> wrote:

> Add a Wycheproof JSON vector validation example for cryptodev PMDs.
> 
> Support these algorithms when advertised by the selected PMD:
> - AEAD: AES-GCM, AES-CCM, SM4-GCM, ChaCha20-Poly1305
> - MAC: AES-CMAC, AES-GMAC, HMAC SHA-1/SHA-2/SHA-3/SM3
> - Asymmetric: DSA (P1363 verify), ECDSA (P1363 verify),
>   ECDH (ecpoint shared-secret compute)
> 
> Validate valid vectors against generated ciphertexts, tags, plaintexts,
> digests, shared secrets, or signature verification, and require the
> expected rejection for invalid vectors. Digest inputs for DSA and ECDSA
> use the symmetric auth path, selecting a separate symmetric-capable
> device when the target device is asymmetric-only.
> 
> Skip parameter combinations outside PMD capability ranges and identify
> recognized vector families without a compatible DPDK transform. A
> --debug option lists every failed or skipped vector.
> 
> Add Meson and standalone build integration, with usage documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>
> ---

AI review had some useful suggestions on this.

Wycheproof validation example (v5) - review

v4 -> v5 delta: drop unused APP_NAME, close the device on the
app_init() error path, and treat asym session-create failure as
-ENOTSUP (skip) instead of -EIO/-ENOMEM (fail) in run_dsa_verify(),
run_ecdh_ecpoint() and run_ecdsa_verify().

Applied on 6bbb7b3, built with -Dwerror=true, docutils clean. Same
crypto_openssl runs as v4: directory run passed=1902 failed=0,
--mbuf-dataroom 160 and --cryptodev-id 256 behave as in v4.

No Errors or Warnings.

Info
----

main.c:1222, 1480, 1715
    ret = -ENOTSUP;
  Session-create failure is now indistinguishable from an unsupported
  curve or key size: a PMD that advertises the xform but fails
  session setup for a curve it claims to support, or a -ENOMEM from
  an exhausted asym session pool, lands in skipped_capability and the
  exit status stays zero. Understood that the asym capability struct
  does not enumerate curves, so this is a documented trade-off; just
  noting that valid asym vectors can no longer fail at session setup.

main.c:823-824, 837, 957, 1047 (open since v3)
    memcmp(output, vector->ct, vector->ct_len) != 0
  memcmp(NULL, NULL, 0) for empty-message vectors; glibc declares
  memcmp nonnull. Guard with len != 0 &&.

main.c:182-183, 266 (open since v3)
  Positional struct initializers; use designated members.

doc/guides/sample_app_ug/wycheproof_validation.rst (open since v3)
  crypto_openssl advertises no ECDSA/ECDH xform capability, so the
  documented command line skips every ECDSA/ECDH vector. One sentence
  saying asymmetric coverage needs a PMD advertising those xforms.

Pre-existing, not introduced by this patch
  lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c:2411 rte_cryptodev_asym_session_create()
    ret = dev->dev_ops->asym_session_configure(dev, xforms, sess);
    if (ret < 0) {
        ...
        return ret;
    }
  On configure failure the object stays allocated from the pool and
  *session still points at it, unlike the sym variant which does
  rte_mempool_put() on its error_exit path. This app copes by freeing
  a non-NULL session at out: even when create returned an error; if
  the library is ever aligned with the sym behaviour that becomes a
  double put. One for the cryptodev maintainers, not this patch.

Review-Result: CLEAN

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-15 15:51 [PATCH] examples: add Wycheproof validation app Kai Ji
2026-09-15 16:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-09-15 18:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-09-17 15:34 ` [PATCH v3] " Kai Ji
2026-09-21 12:05   ` [EXTERNAL] " Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2026-09-21 16:41   ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-09-22 14:47   ` [PATCH v4] " Kai Ji
2026-09-22 16:05     ` [PATCH v5] " Kai Ji
2026-09-22 16:26       ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2026-09-23 10:50       ` [PATCH v6] " Kai Ji
2026-09-23 15:04         ` [PATCH v7] " Kai Ji
2026-09-24 14:35           ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal
2026-09-24 15:01             ` Ji, Kai
2026-09-24 18:00               ` Akhil Goyal
2026-09-25 16:32                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2026-09-29 16:12                   ` Ji, Kai
2026-09-29 18:21                     ` Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260922092614.3c9aacf9@phoenix.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=kai.ji@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox