From: Robert Sanford <rsanford2@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com, Robert Sanford <rsanford@akamai.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 4/4] test/fib6: reproduce table overwrite on address wraparound
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 20:14:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261027001423.3028072-5-rsanford2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027001423.3028072-1-rsanford2@gmail.com>
From: Robert Sanford <rsanford@akamai.com>
Add a test for the case where the more-specific routes under a
modified prefix cover its range up to the top of the address space.
It checks two cases:
- delete ::/0 while ::/1 and 8000::/1 are installed, and check that
both /1 routes still resolve.
- add ffff:...:ff00/120 over ffff:...:ff00/121 and
ffff:...:ff80/121, and check that an unrelated route, an unrouted
address and both /121 routes are unchanged.
Without the fix, the first lookup returns the default next hop and
the second case returns the /120's next hop for every address.
Signed-off-by: Robert Sanford <rsanford@akamai.com>
---
app/test/test_fib6.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 103 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/test/test_fib6.c b/app/test/test_fib6.c
index ad68645428..c44b136760 100644
--- a/app/test/test_fib6.c
+++ b/app/test/test_fib6.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static int32_t test_free_null(void);
static int32_t test_add_del_invalid(void);
static int32_t test_get_invalid(void);
static int32_t test_lookup(void);
+static int32_t test_wraparound(void);
static int32_t test_invalid_rcu(void);
static int32_t test_fib_rcu_sync_rw(void);
static int32_t test_drift(void);
@@ -395,6 +396,107 @@ test_lookup(void)
return TEST_SUCCESS;
}
+/*
+ * Reproducer for the address wraparound bug in modify_dp(). When the
+ * more-specific routes under a modified prefix cover its range up to
+ * ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff, and the last of them starts
+ * exactly at the current left edge, the left edge wraps to :: and the
+ * entire table must not be overwritten.
+ *
+ * Case A: ADD ::/0, ::/1 and 8000::/1, then DEL ::/0. Both /1
+ * routes must still resolve.
+ * Case B: ADD 2001:db8::/32, ffff:...:ff00/121 and
+ * ffff:...:ff80/121, then ADD their covering
+ * ffff:...:ff00/120. No lookup result may change.
+ */
+static int32_t
+test_wraparound(void)
+{
+ struct rte_fib6_conf config = { 0 };
+ struct rte_fib6 *fib;
+ const struct rte_ipv6_addr zero = RTE_IPV6(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ const struct rte_ipv6_addr high = RTE_IPV6(0x8000, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ const struct rte_ipv6_addr net = RTE_IPV6(0x2001, 0xdb8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ const struct rte_ipv6_addr top00 = RTE_IPV6(0xffff, 0xffff, 0xffff,
+ 0xffff, 0xffff, 0xffff, 0xffff, 0xff00);
+ const struct rte_ipv6_addr top80 = RTE_IPV6(0xffff, 0xffff, 0xffff,
+ 0xffff, 0xffff, 0xffff, 0xffff, 0xff80);
+ uint64_t def_nh = 100;
+ struct rte_ipv6_addr ip[4];
+ uint64_t nh[4];
+ int ret;
+
+ config.max_routes = 1024;
+ config.rib_ext_sz = 0;
+ config.default_nh = def_nh;
+ config.type = RTE_FIB6_TRIE;
+ config.trie.nh_sz = RTE_FIB6_TRIE_4B;
+ config.trie.num_tbl8 = 256;
+
+ /* Case A */
+ fib = rte_fib6_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(fib != NULL, "Failed to create FIB\n");
+
+ ret = rte_fib6_add(fib, &zero, 0, 1);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "ADD ::/0 failed (ret=%d)\n", ret);
+ ret = rte_fib6_add(fib, &zero, 1, 2);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "ADD ::/1 failed (ret=%d)\n", ret);
+ ret = rte_fib6_add(fib, &high, 1, 3);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "ADD 8000::/1 failed (ret=%d)\n", ret);
+
+ ret = rte_fib6_delete(fib, &zero, 0);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "DEL ::/0 failed (ret=%d)\n", ret);
+
+ ip[0] = (struct rte_ipv6_addr)RTE_IPV6(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1);
+ ip[1] = (struct rte_ipv6_addr)RTE_IPV6(0xffff, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1);
+ ret = rte_fib6_lookup_bulk(fib, ip, nh, 2);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Lookup failed (ret=%d)\n", ret);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(nh[0] == 2,
+ "::1: got nh %" PRIu64 ", want 2\n", nh[0]);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(nh[1] == 3,
+ "ffff::1: got nh %" PRIu64 ", want 3\n", nh[1]);
+
+ rte_fib6_free(fib);
+
+ /* Case B */
+ fib = rte_fib6_create(__func__, SOCKET_ID_ANY, &config);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(fib != NULL, "Failed to create FIB\n");
+
+ ret = rte_fib6_add(fib, &net, 32, 10);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "ADD 2001:db8::/32 failed (ret=%d)\n", ret);
+ ret = rte_fib6_add(fib, &top00, 121, 5);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0,
+ "ADD ffff:...:ff00/121 failed (ret=%d)\n", ret);
+ ret = rte_fib6_add(fib, &top80, 121, 6);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0,
+ "ADD ffff:...:ff80/121 failed (ret=%d)\n", ret);
+
+ ret = rte_fib6_add(fib, &top00, 120, 7);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0,
+ "ADD ffff:...:ff00/120 failed (ret=%d)\n", ret);
+
+ ip[0] = (struct rte_ipv6_addr)RTE_IPV6(0x2001, 0xdb8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1);
+ ip[1] = (struct rte_ipv6_addr)RTE_IPV6(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1);
+ ip[2] = top00;
+ ip[2].a[15] = 0x01;
+ ip[3] = top80;
+ ip[3].a[15] = 0x81;
+ ret = rte_fib6_lookup_bulk(fib, ip, nh, 4);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "Lookup failed (ret=%d)\n", ret);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(nh[0] == 10,
+ "2001:db8::1: got nh %" PRIu64 ", want 10\n", nh[0]);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(nh[1] == def_nh,
+ "::1: got nh %" PRIu64 ", want %" PRIu64 "\n",
+ nh[1], def_nh);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(nh[2] == 5,
+ "ffff:...:ff01: got nh %" PRIu64 ", want 5\n", nh[2]);
+ RTE_TEST_ASSERT(nh[3] == 6,
+ "ffff:...:ff81: got nh %" PRIu64 ", want 6\n", nh[3]);
+
+ rte_fib6_free(fib);
+ return TEST_SUCCESS;
+}
+
/*
* rte_fib6_rcu_qsbr_add positive and negative tests.
* - Add RCU QSBR variable to FIB
@@ -939,6 +1041,7 @@ static struct unit_test_suite fib6_fast_tests = {
TEST_CASE(test_add_del_invalid),
TEST_CASE(test_get_invalid),
TEST_CASE(test_lookup),
+ TEST_CASE(test_wraparound),
TEST_CASE(test_invalid_rcu),
TEST_CASE(test_fib_rcu_sync_rw),
TEST_CASE(test_drift),
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 0:14 [PATCH v1 0/4] fib: fix full table overwrite on address wraparound Robert Sanford
2026-10-27 0:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] " Robert Sanford
2026-10-27 0:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] fib6: " Robert Sanford
2026-10-27 0:14 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] test/fib: reproduce " Robert Sanford
2026-10-27 0:14 ` Robert Sanford [this message]
2026-10-27 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] fib: fix full " Robert Sanford
2026-10-27 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] rib: fix undefined behavior in bit test Robert Sanford
2026-10-27 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] fib: fix full table overwrite on address wraparound Robert Sanford
2026-10-27 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] fib6: " Robert Sanford
2026-10-27 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] test/fib: reproduce " Robert Sanford
2026-10-27 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] test/fib6: " Robert Sanford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261027001423.3028072-5-rsanford2@gmail.com \
--to=rsanford2@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=rsanford@akamai.com \
--cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox