From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
Cc: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com>,
Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] net/mlx5: improvements to link status handling
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 08:29:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261104082926.47f4ff38@stephen-xps.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR12MB7077AFBC1E81E2E489F6CAE1A4692@PH0PR12MB7077.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:04:39 +0000
Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > Sent: Monday, November 2, 2026 9:08 AM
> > To: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Bing Zhao
> > <bingz@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; Suanming Mou
> > <suanmingm@nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>;
> > dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] net/mlx5: improvements to link status handling
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Oct 2026 18:28:41 +0100
> > Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This series is a result of splitting patch:
> > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20261026160400.1290443-1-
> > d
> > > sosnowski@nvidia.com/
> > >
> > > Patch 1 - Fix for mlx5 link update function to query current link
> > > carrier status, bypassing the delay introduced by linkwatch in Linux kernel.
> > >
> > > Patch 2 - Move to link status polling, in place of relying on netlink
> > > events which can be delayed by linkwatch for up to 1s.
> >
> > Instead of polling is there a way to get the lsc directly from devx or ibv on
> > mlx5? That would work around the issue and avoid the overhead.
>
> From DevX, unfortunately no.
>
> In ibv there are 2 options:
>
> - IBV_EVENT_PORT_ACTIVE/ERR - generated on up/down respectively;
> On ethernet devices, these are generated from netdev carrier state, so they are
> subjected to the same linkwatch delay.
>
> - IBV_EVENT_DEVICE_SPEED_CHANGE - generated on up and down;
> Is generated immediately on FW event reception.
> It is available from Linux kernel v7.0 and rdma-core v62.0.
>
> IBV_EVENT_DEVICE_SPEED_CHANGE would be ideal here,
> but there's no good way to discover whether currently running kernel supports it.
>
> Theoretically, this event was added alongside ibv_query_port_speed() IB verb.
> Following logic could be implemented (for DPDK compiled with recent rdma-core)
>
> - Call ibv_query_port_speed()
> - If error:
> - start listening on device speed change async event
> - on event: query link status of DPDK ports on that device
> - else if ENOTSUP:
> - start link status poll loop
>
> >
> > Long term, it would be good if kernel had sysctl to set linkwatch per interface
> > but it doesn't
I have a patch to allow link watch timeout to be set via netlink or sysfs.
But needs more testing. In future, mlx5 could detect and configure that.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 16:04 [PATCH] net/mlx5: move to polling for LSC interrupts Dariusz Sosnowski
2026-10-26 17:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-29 17:21 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2026-10-26 17:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2026-10-29 17:19 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2026-10-30 17:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/mlx5: improvements to link status handling Dariusz Sosnowski
2026-10-30 17:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net/mlx5: fix link status query Dariusz Sosnowski
2026-11-05 7:37 ` Raslan Darawsheh
2026-10-30 17:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net/mlx5: move to polling for LSC interrupts Dariusz Sosnowski
2026-11-05 7:37 ` Raslan Darawsheh
2026-11-02 8:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] net/mlx5: improvements to link status handling Stephen Hemminger
2026-11-03 11:04 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2026-11-04 7:29 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261104082926.47f4ff38@stephen-xps.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=bingz@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=suanmingm@nvidia.com \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox