From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: dpdk daily build error on dpdk16.07-rc2 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:48:44 +0200 Message-ID: <2029172.eKyuoxE5qy@xps13> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "Richardson, Bruce" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" , Jan Medala , dev@dpdk.org, "Cao, Waterman" , "Chen, WeichunX" , "Xu, HuilongX" , "Glynn, Michael J" , "Gu, YongjieX" , "Pattan, Reshma" To: "Liu, Yu Y" Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com (mail-lf0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431763237 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:48:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b199so62875049lfe.0 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 05:48:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-07-14 11:34, Liu, Yu Y: > Hi Thomas, > > Would you check who can work on "dpdk16.07-rc2 compile error on FC18 & UB1204"? I think I've already fixed it: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/043918.html > For "dpdk16.07-rc2 compile error on suse11", I saw document shows we support suse12+. > Seems it is not issue for this release. > Agree? If there is a fix, I will apply it. But yes you can stop testing Suse 11.