dev.dpdk.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Ognjen Joldzic <ognjen.joldzic-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: 82546EB Copper issue
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:57:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2031360.6MEvh5xnbq@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAArUB1gNjCScrPbmCS6QNwdWn7zPgddescyMOg+qfzNN+uX8Dw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

Hello,

19/11/2013 23:44, Ognjen Joldzic :
> Recently I came across a 82546EB Dual-port Gigabit Ethernet (Copper) NIC
> and tried to include it in our current DPDK setup. However, the card
> doesn't seem to be supported (I was unable to bind the igb_uio driver).
> There was a post in mailing list earlier this year stating that this
> particular NIC is not supported as of r1.2.3.
> Is the situation any different with the 1.5.0 release (or are there any
> plans to support this model)?

The page http://dpdk.org/doc/nics says that 8254x should be supported.
But looking in details:
% grep 'RTE_PCI_DEV_ID_DECL.*8254' lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h
RTE_PCI_DEV_ID_DECL_EM(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_82540EM)
RTE_PCI_DEV_ID_DECL_EM(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_82545EM_COPPER)
RTE_PCI_DEV_ID_DECL_EM(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_82545EM_FIBER)

It means that only 82540 and 82545 are supported.
I don't know if there is a big difference with 82546 controller
and I'm not aware of any plan to support it.
So feel free to try and patch it.

-- 
Thomas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-20  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-19 22:44 82546EB Copper issue Ognjen Joldzic
     [not found] ` <CAArUB1gNjCScrPbmCS6QNwdWn7zPgddescyMOg+qfzNN+uX8Dw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-20  7:57   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2013-11-22  7:30     ` Ognjen Joldzic
     [not found]       ` <CAArUB1iHoG7SVkRC6O1h0eWkEmiKjOtvN1ie04y4HJ7G=MzUBA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-22  8:55         ` Thomas Monjalon
2013-12-20 12:52         ` [PATCH] pci: support 82546EB Thomas Monjalon
     [not found]           ` <1387543962-7633-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-02 15:08             ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2031360.6MEvh5xnbq@x220 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon-pdr9zngts4eavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ognjen.joldzic-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).