From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] mk: fix build of assembly files for ARM64 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:45:57 +0100 Message-ID: <2047286.uqzdbYr9PH@xps13> References: <1484663736-32195-1-git-send-email-zbigniew.bodek@caviumnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com To: zbigniew.bodek@caviumnetworks.com Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC69DE5 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:45:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c85so220996150wmi.1 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:45:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1484663736-32195-1-git-send-email-zbigniew.bodek@caviumnetworks.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2017-01-17 15:35, zbigniew.bodek@caviumnetworks.com: > -# for now, we don't use as but nasm. > -# AS = $(CROSS)as It looks to be a very very old comment. > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_X86),y) > AS = nasm There is no asm file in DPDK as far as I know. So why would we have a dependency on nasm for x86? > +else > +AS = $(CROSS)as > +endif