From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] doc: modify release notes and
	deprecation notice for table and pipeline
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:22:47 +0200
Message-ID: <2067349.o1BFDiCzax@xps13>
References: <1441967499-21255-1-git-send-email-maciejx.t.gajdzica@intel.com>
 <2407802.7feZ9f3Uac@xps13>
 <4837007523CC9A4B9414D20C13DE6E6413627B00@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: "Azarewicz, PiotrX T" <piotrx.t.azarewicz@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com
 [209.85.212.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C52A568E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:23:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so40628840wic.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 01:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4837007523CC9A4B9414D20C13DE6E6413627B00@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-10-12 07:53, Azarewicz, PiotrX T:
> Hi Thomas,
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > Hi Maciej,
> > 
> > 2015-09-11 12:31, Maciej Gajdzica:
> > > --- a/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline_version.map
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline_version.map
> > > @@ -29,3 +29,11 @@ DPDK_2.1 {
> > >  	rte_pipeline_table_stats_read;
> > >
> > >  } DPDK_2.0;
> > > +
> > > +DPDK_2.2 {
> > > +	global:
> > > +
> > > +	rte_pipeline_table_entry_add_bulk;
> > > +	rte_pipeline_table_entry_delete_bulk;
> > > +
> > > +} DPDK_2.1;
> > 
> > The previous block was DPDK_2.0 for this library.
> > So I think you should inherit from it, not DPDK_2.1 which doesn't exist in this
> > context.
> 
> The previous block was DPDK_2.1 :
> 
> DPDK_2.1 {
> 	global:
> 
> 	rte_pipeline_port_in_stats_read;
> 	rte_pipeline_port_out_stats_read;
> 	rte_pipeline_table_stats_read;
> 
> } DPDK_2.0;
> 
> So I think this patch is okay.
> Correct me if I am wrong with my understanding, please.

You are perfectly right.
Sorry for the confusion.