From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] examples/power: remove mask functions Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:01:24 +0000 Message-ID: <210a7db6-ed22-5942-0741-3e6a1ae143f9@intel.com> References: <20181122170220.55482-2-david.hunt@intel.com> <20181214114946.21570-1-david.hunt@intel.com> <20181214114946.21570-3-david.hunt@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lei.a.yao@intel.com To: David Hunt , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2108D1B5AA for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:01:26 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20181214114946.21570-3-david.hunt@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 14-Dec-18 11:49 AM, David Hunt wrote: > since we're moving to allowing greater than 64 cores, the mask functions > that use uint64_t to perform functions on a masked set of cores are no > longer needed, so removing them. > > Signed-off-by: David Hunt > --- Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov -- Thanks, Anatoly