From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: Removal of IP version from packet offload feature
	flags
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:22:07 +0200
Message-ID: <2119986.60i7VtTGDM@xps13>
References: <55E40A4F.3030406@ics.muni.cz> <4354342.IqQZSKtSMX@xps13>
 <55E42F25.4020406@ics.muni.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Martin =?utf-8?B?RHJhxaFhcg==?= <drasar@ics.muni.cz>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com
 [209.85.212.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC0A91A1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:23:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicpl12 with SMTP id pl12so25958123wic.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 05:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55E42F25.4020406@ics.muni.cz>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-08-31 12:40, Martin Dra=C5=A1ar:
> Dne 31.8.2015 v 10:56 Thomas Monjalon napsal(a):
> > In order to keep compatibility with your old code, you have to disa=
ble
> > RTE_NEXT_ABI in your configuration file (.config).
>=20
> I have done this and the code works, but because the project is in
> prototype stage, I would like to keep it working with the newest vers=
ion.
>=20
> > See "Extended packet type support" in
> > =09http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_1.html
> > and
> > =09http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.html
> >
>=20
> Now I remember that I read this. However, nowhere I see possible valu=
es
> for the packet_type. Is it documented somewhere, or will this be
> documented in upcoming release?

It does not appear in doxygen (patch welcome) but it is documented.
Check RTE_PTYPE_* in lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h