From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] doc:add tested platforms and nics Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 16:47:40 +0200 Message-ID: <2126301.mhDi6LQXts@xps13> References: <1460105823-2013-1-git-send-email-qian.q.xu@intel.com> <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E03236545@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "Mcnamara, John" , dev@dpdk.org To: "Xu, Qian Q" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149812BD9 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:47:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id u206so25520721wme.1 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:47:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E03236545@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-04-08 14:29, Xu, Qian Q: > Agreed, and others can add their NICs info into the tested NICs and platforms. One question about the release version, the NICs and platforms may change with the release version, for example, for each release, the information may be different, so we need mention the release version for the tested nics and platforms. Then how about putting them in one session of release notes? Please do at your convenience but do it quickly. Thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: Mcnamara, John > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 6:05 PM > To: Thomas Monjalon; Xu, Qian Q > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc:add tested platforms and nics > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 10:06 AM > > To: Xu, Qian Q > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Mcnamara, John > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc:add tested platforms and nics > > > > > overview > > > + test_platforms > > > > I think it would be better suited to integrate this information in the > > existing pages for e1000, ixgbe, i40e and fm10k. > > Hi, > > I think that this is better in one section where it can be reviewed together. I think it should be the last chapter in the section though. > > John. >